5.7x28 FN FMJ vs FN SS197 Ballistic Gel Review & Test

This video from Boondock Ballistician delves into the 5.7x28mm cartridge, examining its performance against its 'hype.' The host, demonstrating high authority, details its history, technical evolution from SS90 to SS190, and its competition for NATO standardization. The analysis includes ballistic comparisons with 9mm, highlighting 5.7's flatter trajectory and lower recoil but faster velocity/energy loss, and discusses reloading challenges.

This video title, "Melhor que uma ponta oca!" (Better than a hollow point!), strongly suggests a comparison or discussion about ammunition effectiveness, likely focusing on terminal ballistics or defensive ammunition. The phrase "ponta oca" specifically refers to hollow-point ammunition, a common choice for self-defense and hunting due to its expansion properties. The video likely aims to present an alternative or superior option, possibly a full metal jacket (FMJ) round used in a specific context, or perhaps a different type of expanding projectile that the creator deems more effective. The content could involve ballistic gel tests, theoretical discussions, or real-world application scenarios to support its claim.

The Gun Collective reviews the KelTec KP-50, a 9-inch 5.7 pistol, raising questions about potential design theft from 'Stuff and Things Inc.' due to striking similarities in the lower receiver and magazine coupler. The video also briefly highlights new products from Sig Sauer, Tandemkross, Henry, Savage, G Force Arms, and various accessory manufacturers like Federal, Zero Tech Optics, MDT, Fix It Sticks, Real Avid, and Wheeler.

This YouTube video explores the difference between Hollow Point (HP) and Full Metal Jacket (FMJ) ammunition by conducting a test using a pumpkin. The title directly poses the question of which ammunition type is superior in this specific test scenario. While the exact firearm and calibers are not explicitly stated in the provided text, the comparison of ammunition types suggests a practical demonstration relevant to firearm enthusiasts interested in terminal ballistics and ammunition performance.

This video delves into the controversial 7N6 ammunition, often dubbed the "poisonous" bullet. It examines the Soviet-designed round's construction, terminal ballistics through tests with ballistic gel and water jugs, and compares its performance against standard FMJ ammunition. The content also explores the legality of 7N6, its supposed bypassing of international laws like the Geneva Convention, and debunks myths surrounding its "poisonous" nature. The AK-74 is highlighted as the primary firearm chambered for this round, with a comparison to 5.56mm Green Tip ammunition also featured.

This video conducts a ballistic gel test comparing the Speer Gold Dot .22WMR and the 5.7x28mm. It includes links to other gel test videos for various ammunition types and firearms accessories, such as holsters, steel targets, cameras, and hearing protection. The description also highlights various shooting accessories and general range equipment, indicating a focus on firearm performance and related gear.

This video compares the terminal performance of five common pistol calibers (.22LR, .380 ACP, 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP) by shooting watermelons. The test demonstrates a significant increase in destructive power from .22LR up to .45 ACP, with the larger calibers causing more explosive expansion and fragmentation. Specific hollow-point ammunition from Speer, Aguila, and Underwood was used, highlighting the importance of bullet construction for terminal ballistics.

Buckeye Ballistics conducted a comparative test of common pistol calibers (.22LR, .380 ACP, 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP) against concrete blocks. The host, demonstrating significant firearm and ballistics knowledge, emphasized extreme safety precautions due to ricochet risks. The test revealed that while larger calibers showed more damage, none could fully penetrate the concrete block's second wall, suggesting limitations for self-defense scenarios against hardened barriers.

This Taurus TX22 review details its performance with various .22 LR ammunition. While initially reliable with CCI Mini-Mags and cycling standard velocity rounds well, it encountered malfunctions with sub-sonic and high-velocity loads. A catastrophic failure occurred due to a squib load followed by a second shot, resulting in a bulged barrel and damaged magazine.

This video compares the terminal ballistics of .22LR, .22WMR, and .17HMR rimfire cartridges using cantaloupes as targets. The .22LR showed a clean pass-through with minor damage, the .22WMR caused an explosive front-face disintegration, and the .17HMR, despite its speed, disintegrated internally with no exit. The test highlights how different rimfire rounds perform on soft tissue simulants.