Clash of the Titans 4: Sand Tornadoes!

Published on November 13, 2016
Duration: 10:38

This video details the performance of an AK variant (Veper) and a Daniel Defense rifle during a 'sand tornado' test. Both rifles experienced stoppages after a limited number of rounds due to sand ingress. The AK stopped with the bolt carrier failing to seat a round, while the Daniel Defense failed to pick up a round from the magazine. Post-malfunction clearing and cleaning procedures are demonstrated, highlighting the ease of cleaning for both platforms despite the harsh conditions. The presenter expresses surprise at the comparable performance and the minimal damage observed after cleaning.

Quick Summary

In a 'sand tornado' test, an AK variant (Veper) stopped after five rounds due to a failure to seat a round, while a Daniel Defense stopped after six rounds failing to pick up a round from the magazine. The Daniel Defense had less sand ingress, but both were easily cleaned and returned to function.

Chapters

  1. 00:20Introduction to Clash of the Titans
  2. 00:36The Sand Tornado Test Begins
  3. 01:02Veper (AK) Malfunction and Stoppage
  4. 01:52Daniel Defense Malfunction and Stoppage
  5. 02:13Sand Ingress Comparison
  6. 03:31Malfunction Clearing and Cleaning Process
  7. 05:22Detailed Inspection: Veper (AK) Internals
  8. 08:11Detailed Inspection: Daniel Defense Internals
  9. 09:51Overall Performance Summary
  10. 10:10Conclusion and Next Episode Tease

Frequently Asked Questions

How did an AK variant and a Daniel Defense rifle perform in a sand environment test?

In a 'sand tornado' test, both rifles experienced malfunctions. The AK variant stopped after five rounds due to the bolt carrier failing to seat a round, while the Daniel Defense stopped after six rounds when the bolt carrier didn't pick up a round from the magazine.

Which rifle had less sand ingress during the sand tornado test?

The Daniel Defense rifle showed significantly less sand in its action and chamber compared to the AK variant. This is attributed to the Daniel Defense's design featuring better sealing of the action area.

How easy were the AK variant and Daniel Defense rifles to clean after the sand test?

Both rifles were found to be relatively easy to clean. The AK's open access after removing the dust cover was noted, and both were cleared of sand using a blower and bore snakes in under 10 minutes.

What were the internal wear observations on the AK variant and Daniel Defense after the sand test?

The AK variant showed normal wear, including a wobbling piston head and minor trunnion scratches. The Daniel Defense exhibited minimal wear, with no deformations observed on its bolt, firing pin, or cam pin.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from AK Operators Union, Local 47-74

View all →