Fort Scott 5.56 NATO T.U.I Ammo

Published on June 21, 2019
Duration: 13:53

This video from Iraqveteran8888 features an expert-level review and testing of two Fort Scott Munitions 5.56 NATO loads: the 55-grain Brushhog (solid copper) and the 62-grain Brasshog (solid brass). The instructor meticulously tests their terminal ballistics through various mediums including ballistic gel with clothing, drywall, watermelons, pine boards, and milk jugs. The analysis focuses on projectile behavior like tumbling and yawing, and their effects on wound channels and penetration.

Quick Summary

Expert analysis of Fort Scott 5.56 NATO ammunition reveals distinct performance differences between the 55gr Brushhog (solid copper) and 62gr Brasshog (solid brass). The 62gr Brasshog shows superior straight-line penetration through barriers like pine boards, making it ideal for larger game. The 55gr Brushhog's tendency to yaw and tumble is advantageous for varmint control, creating significant wound channels.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction and Ammo Overview
  2. 00:2955gr Ballistic Gel Test Setup
  3. 00:54Firing 55gr into Gel
  4. 01:0555gr Gel Results Analysis
  5. 01:3855gr Projectile Examination
  6. 01:50Bullet Yaw and Cavity Discussion
  7. 02:2762gr Ballistic Gel Test Setup
  8. 02:44Firing 62gr into Gel
  9. 02:5462gr Gel Results Analysis
  10. 03:30Comparing 55gr and 62gr Gel Performance
  11. 04:32Drywall and Watermelon Test Setup (55gr)
  12. 04:54Firing 55gr into Drywall/Watermelon
  13. 05:1255gr Drywall/Watermelon Results
  14. 06:06Drywall and Watermelon Test Setup (62gr)
  15. 06:24Firing 62gr into Drywall/Watermelon
  16. 06:3462gr Drywall/Watermelon Results
  17. 07:16Pine Baffle Test Setup (55gr)
  18. 07:44Firing 55gr into Pine Baffles/Soda
  19. 07:5655gr Pine Baffle Results
  20. 08:52Pine Baffle Test Setup (62gr)
  21. 09:06Firing 62gr into Pine Baffles/Soda
  22. 09:1962gr Pine Baffle Results
  23. 09:53Ammo Recommendations for Hunting
  24. 10:24Milk Jug Test Setup (55gr)
  25. 10:41Firing 55gr into Milk Jugs
  26. 10:5255gr Milk Jug Results
  27. 11:30Milk Jug Test Setup (62gr)
  28. 11:50Firing 62gr into Milk Jugs
  29. 12:0562gr Milk Jug Results
  30. 13:00Conclusion and Future Plans

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the key differences between Fort Scott 5.56 NATO Brushhog and Brasshog ammunition?

The 55gr Brushhog is a solid copper projectile, while the 62gr Brasshog is a solid brass projectile. Testing shows the 62gr Brasshog penetrates straighter through barriers like pine boards, whereas the 55gr Brushhog tends to yaw and tumble, which can be advantageous for varmint control.

How did the Fort Scott 5.56 NATO Brushhog perform in ballistic gel?

The 55gr Brushhog penetrated approximately 19.75 inches in ballistic gel after passing through clothing. It yawed and tumbled, creating a significant wound channel but dipping low in the second gel block. The solid copper projectile retained its weight and shape.

What was the performance difference between the 55gr Brushhog and 62gr Brasshog in pine board penetration tests?

The 62gr Brasshog penetrated all eight pine boards cleanly without yawing. In contrast, the 55gr Brushhog began to tumble around the fifth board, creating wider, sideways exit holes, indicating less stable penetration through dense material.

Which Fort Scott 5.56 NATO load is recommended for hunting different types of game?

Based on terminal ballistics testing, the 62gr Brasshog is recommended for hunting larger game due to its straighter penetration. The 55gr Brushhog, with its tumbling effect, is considered better suited for varmint control like coyotes or foxes.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from Iraqveteran8888

View all →