Is the M&P Holding up?

Published on July 13, 2025
Duration: 15:20

This video provides an in-depth review of the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 pistol, focusing on its performance after extensive live-fire testing. The instructor, Ben Stoeger, discusses the firearm's reliability, ergonomics, and potential for modification. He compares it to other popular pistols like the Glock 47 and Walther PDP, highlighting areas where the M&P 2.0 excels and where it could be improved through aftermarket upgrades.

Quick Summary

The Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 FDE with manual safety has proven highly reliable, firing around 1,500 rounds without malfunctions, even uncleaned. However, its thinner grip compared to a Glock can affect draw stroke consistency and trigger control, leading to occasional accuracy issues. Aftermarket upgrades like grip tape and an Apex trigger are recommended to optimize performance.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction to M&P 2.0 FDE
  2. 00:06M&P 2.0 with Manual Safety
  3. 00:35Round Count & Reliability Update
  4. 00:55Uncleaned M&P 2.0 Performance
  5. 01:17Grip Struggles & Draw Stroke Issues
  6. 02:15Accuracy Observations & Flyers
  7. 03:05Trigger Feel & Comparison to Glock
  8. 04:22Planned Modifications: Grip Tape & Apex Trigger
  9. 04:44M&P 2.0 vs. PDP & Glock 47
  10. 05:38Mechanical Accuracy Concerns
  11. 06:43Aftermarket Barrel Consideration
  12. 07:29Viewer Comments & M&P Discussion
  13. 08:00Smith & Wesson's Social Media Antics
  14. 08:42Need for Apex Trigger
  15. 09:16M&P vs. Glock 47 Recommendation
  16. 10:07Apex Trigger for M&P - The Chosen One
  17. 10:41Apex M&P Trigger Kit Performance
  18. 11:36Common M&P Modifications
  19. 11:48Base Pad Lip Issue & Grip Tape Benefit
  20. 12:21Joel Park's Philosophy on Gun Choice
  21. 13:28Apex & M&P Synergy
  22. 14:19Apex Trigger After 2000 Rounds
  23. 14:36Considering Aftermarket Barrel
  24. 15:04Comfort with M&P Impulse

Frequently Asked Questions

How reliable is the Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 after extensive shooting?

The Smith & Wesson M&P 2.0 FDE with a manual safety has demonstrated excellent reliability, firing approximately 1,500 rounds without a single malfunction, even when uncleaned. This suggests a robust mechanical design capable of handling significant use.

What are the main ergonomic challenges with the M&P 2.0 compared to a Glock?

The M&P 2.0's grip is perceived as thinner and more elongated than a Glock's. This can delay the support hand's connection during the draw stroke and make it harder to apply consistent pressure, potentially affecting shooting accuracy.

How does the M&P 2.0 trigger compare to a Glock's trigger?

The M&P 2.0 trigger features a longer reach and more travel compared to a Glock's trigger. This, combined with grip inconsistencies, can occasionally lead to shooters 'shanking' their shots, causing them to deviate from the intended point of aim.

What aftermarket modifications are recommended for the M&P 2.0?

Recommended modifications for the M&P 2.0 include applying grip tape to enhance the grip texture and thickness, installing an Apex FSS trigger kit for a crisper pull and shorter reset, and potentially an aftermarket barrel to improve mechanical accuracy.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from Ben Stoeger

View all →