L85A1 Problems: With Jonathan Ferguson of the British Royal Armouries

Published on May 11, 2025
Duration: 0:59

Jonathan Ferguson of the Royal Armouries explains that the L85A1's fundamental design flaws, such as the ejection port size, could not have been fixed by Enfield even if the company hadn't been sold. While improved quality control might have reduced malfunctions, the inherent issues would have persisted, making the SA80 platform problematic regardless of manufacturing.

Quick Summary

The L85A1 rifle's problems stemmed from inherent design flaws, such as its ejection port size, not just poor quality control. Even with improved manufacturing by Enfield, these fundamental issues would have persisted, making the SA80 platform unreliable.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Enfield's Sale and L85A1 Problems
  2. 00:15Quality Control vs. Design Flaws
  3. 00:30Inherent Design Issues Explained
  4. 00:45Conclusion on the SA80 Platform

Frequently Asked Questions

Could Enfield have fixed the L85A1's problems if they hadn't been sold?

According to Jonathan Ferguson, the answer is no. While improved quality control might have reduced malfunctions, the L85A1 suffered from inherent design flaws, such as the ejection port size, which would have persisted regardless of manufacturing quality.

What were the main design flaws of the L85A1 rifle?

The L85A1, along with the L86A1, had inherent micro-scale design flaws. A key example cited is the size of the ejection port opening, which was too small and contributed to reliability issues independently of manufacturing quality.

Did quality control issues cause the L85A1's problems?

Quality control issues, exacerbated by Enfield's impending shutdown, did lead to more malfunctions. However, Jonathan Ferguson emphasizes that these were secondary to the rifle's fundamental design flaws, meaning better QC wouldn't have solved the core problems.

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from Forgotten Weapons

View all →