Minimalist 22LR survival rifle reprise… KSA Overlander Pack rifle. Is it the best yet? Overview

This video concludes a comparison series of minimalist .22LR survival rifles. The host promises surprising results regarding which .22LR rifle reigns supreme in this final installment. Viewers are encouraged to watch previous parts of the series for context on the comparisons made.

This video is the third part of a series comparing minimalist .22LR survival rifles, focusing on reliability. The test primarily used Remington Golden Bullet ammunition. The Ruger 10/22 models experienced some extraction issues due to low-velocity rounds but were otherwise reliable. The Henry rifle had minor loading problems and a surprisingly good trigger. The Chiappa rifle was described as very disappointing and nicknamed "Crappy little badger." A final wrap-up video is planned.

This video presents part two of a series on a minimalist .22LR survival rifle, focusing on accuracy during rapid follow-up shots and higher volume firing. The reviewer compares the performance of a Chiappa, a Henry, and Ruger 10/22 models. The Chiappa's rear sight is noted as problematic. The Henry rifle is surprisingly effective for quick shooting due to its light barrel, while the 10/22 variants are described as easier to shoot overall, with the Butler Creek version being particularly enjoyable. The video acknowledges poor camera quality due to technical issues.

This video is part two of a minimalist .22LR survival rifle series, focusing on accuracy tests at 25 and 50 yards. The reviewer compares the Chiappa Little Badger, the Henry .22 Rifle, and Ruger 10/22 models. The Chiappa Little Badger was found to be disappointing in terms of accuracy and reliability. The Henry .22 performed better with good accuracy and trigger, but its reliability was only 'OK'. The Ruger 10/22 models were the standout performers, praised for ease of use, better reliability, and familiar controls. The reviewer mentions camera issues causing blurriness.

This review focuses on a vintage 1980s Smith & Wesson Model 60 'no dash' revolver, highlighting its classic features like the pinned barrel and hammer-mounted firing pin. The speaker, an experienced collector, details the firearm's provenance and its acquisition from a local FFL. The review emphasizes the enduring appeal and collectibility of these early stainless steel revolvers.

This benchtop review compares the Chiappa Little Badger, Ruger 10/22 Takedown, and Henry US Survival .22LR rifles for survival scenarios. The Little Badger excels in deployment/storage speed and weight, while the Henry offers superior portability by storing all parts in its stock. The Ruger 10/22 leads in capacity and ergonomics but is the heaviest and most expensive.

The Savage Model 301 is a budget-friendly, single-shot, break-action shotgun in .410 bore, ideal for survival or as an affordable firearm. It features a simple operation, a manual safety with a hammer block for safe carrying, and a 26-inch barrel with screw-in chokes. Its key advantage is its easy two-piece takedown for portability and storage, making it an excellent value under $200.

This video explores the process of hand-reloading .410 shotshells, comparing it to reloading 20 and 12 gauge ammunition. The creator details the specific components used, including Winchester and Cheddite primers, Winchester 296 powder, Winchester and Remington hulls, Claybuster wads, and #6 shot. The video aims to determine if reloading this smaller shotshell caliber is a cost-effective endeavor, with the outcome to be revealed over time.