PMC Bronze 55gr .223 vs X-Tac 62gr 5.56 Green Tip Ballistic Gel Test & Review

This YouTube video delves into the quality and performance of Palmetto State Armory (PSA) rifles, questioning if they are "just as good" as other options. The description includes links for channel support through patches, Patreon, Venmo, and Instagram. A legal disclaimer emphasizes that the views are those of the creator and not affiliated with any government agency, referencing unclassified doctrine and public source information for context. The video appears to be a comparative review or an evaluation of PSA firearms.

This YouTube video provides a comprehensive breakdown of the Knight's Armament SR-15 Mod 2 rifle. The review covers various aspects of the firearm, including its barrel, gas system, controls, recoil impulse, and overall reliability. It delves into what distinguishes the SR-15 from a standard AR-15 platform and evaluates its performance on the range. The video aims to explain the rifle's premium price point and determine if it lives up to its reputation and is worth the investment.

This YouTube video pits an "old school dissipator" AR-15 against newer AR-15 variants, focusing on a comparison between iron sights and optics. The description notes the video "goes off the rails a little toward the end" but remains entertaining, suggesting a casual and potentially humorous approach to the firearm comparison. The video likely involves range testing and practical evaluation of different sighting systems on AR-15 platforms.

This YouTube Short appears to be a comparison or showcase of an AR-platform rifle, with the title suggesting it's superior to others. The description includes a link to the creator's gear and exclusive discounts, indicating a potential focus on product recommendations or affiliate marketing. Given the title's boastful nature and the inclusion of gear information, the video likely highlights modifications, custom builds, or specific features of the firearm. It's aimed at an audience interested in AR-15s and potentially related accessories or upgrades.

This YouTube video title, 'Water Jug vs AR15?', suggests a comparative test or demonstration involving an AR-15 platform rifle and a water jug. The content likely focuses on the ballistic performance or durability of the AR-15 against a common, non-standard target. Given the title, the video is expected to be a visual examination of what happens when an AR-15 is fired at a water jug, potentially assessing penetration or fragmentation.

This video provides a detailed performance analysis of a Bear Creek Arsenal (BCA) 20" HBAR barrel, a brand often perceived as budget-oriented. The reviewer conducts a thorough inspection using a borescope and gauges, examines the gas port, crown, and rifling, and performs a break-in process. The core of the video is a 30-shot group test at 100 yards using Federal Gold Medal 77gr SMK, IMI Razor Core 77gr, and Winchester M193 55gr FMJ ammunition. Velocity data is captured with a Garmin Zero C1 Pro, and performance is scored using A-ZED metrics. The review aims to provide data for those interested in budget barrels or comparing BCA to higher-end options.

This video compares the terminal performance of five common pistol calibers (.22LR, .380 ACP, 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP) by shooting watermelons. The test demonstrates a significant increase in destructive power from .22LR up to .45 ACP, with the larger calibers causing more explosive expansion and fragmentation. Specific hollow-point ammunition from Speer, Aguila, and Underwood was used, highlighting the importance of bullet construction for terminal ballistics.

Buckeye Ballistics conducted a comparative test of common pistol calibers (.22LR, .380 ACP, 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP) against concrete blocks. The host, demonstrating significant firearm and ballistics knowledge, emphasized extreme safety precautions due to ricochet risks. The test revealed that while larger calibers showed more damage, none could fully penetrate the concrete block's second wall, suggesting limitations for self-defense scenarios against hardened barriers.

This Taurus TX22 review details its performance with various .22 LR ammunition. While initially reliable with CCI Mini-Mags and cycling standard velocity rounds well, it encountered malfunctions with sub-sonic and high-velocity loads. A catastrophic failure occurred due to a squib load followed by a second shot, resulting in a bulged barrel and damaged magazine.

This video compares the terminal ballistics of .22LR, .22WMR, and .17HMR rimfire cartridges using cantaloupes as targets. The .22LR showed a clean pass-through with minor damage, the .22WMR caused an explosive front-face disintegration, and the .17HMR, despite its speed, disintegrated internally with no exit. The test highlights how different rimfire rounds perform on soft tissue simulants.