Pulsar vs ATN | Thermal Showdown

Published on October 12, 2019
Duration: 25:35

This video provides an expert-level comparison of the ATN ThOR 4 and Pulsar Thermion XM50 thermal scopes, drawing on extensive field testing by 4MR Ranch. The review highlights key differences in performance, usability, and price, offering practical insights for viewers considering thermal optic purchases. The speaker's authority is evident through detailed technical analysis and direct comparisons of features like display brightness and battery life.

Quick Summary

The ATN ThOR 4 and Pulsar Thermion XM50 thermal scopes were compared by 4MR Ranch. The ATN offers superior daytime usability with a brighter display and longer 18-hour battery life, while the Pulsar has a dimmer screen and ~6-hour battery. The ATN's 90mm eye relief is safer for high-recoil rifles than the Pulsar's 50mm.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction & Comparison Setup
  2. 01:01Model Specifications
  3. 02:21Price Comparison
  4. 03:13Physical Design and Weight
  5. 04:01Battery Life
  6. 07:26Storage and Memory
  7. 08:59Eye Relief Comparison
  8. 09:36Display Brightness Issues
  9. 11:53Zoom Functionality
  10. 13:35User Interface Differences
  11. 16:52Zeroing Process and Features
  12. 18:10Audio and Video Export

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference in display usability between the ATN ThOR 4 and Pulsar Thermion XM50?

The ATN ThOR 4 features a significantly brighter display, making it much more usable in bright daylight conditions. In contrast, the Pulsar Thermion XM50's display is difficult to see even at maximum settings when exposed to direct sunlight.

How do the ATN ThOR 4 and Pulsar Thermion XM50 compare in terms of battery life?

The ATN ThOR 4 boasts an internal battery life of approximately 18 hours. The Pulsar Thermion XM50 uses a dual system (internal + removable) that provides roughly 6 hours of total operational time, making the ATN the clear winner for extended use.

Which thermal scope is safer for high-recoil firearms, the ATN ThOR 4 or Pulsar Thermion XM50?

The ATN ThOR 4 is considered safer due to its 90mm eye relief, which provides a greater distance between the shooter's eye and the scope. The Pulsar Thermion XM50 has a shorter eye relief of 50mm, increasing the risk of scope bite on powerful firearms.

What are the key differences in recording features between the ATN ThOR 4 and Pulsar Thermion XM50?

The ATN ThOR 4 records audio along with video and uses a removable SD card (up to 64GB) for storage. The Pulsar Thermion XM50, in its earlier models, does not record audio and has 16GB of internal storage, requiring a computer connection to transfer footage.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from 4MR Ranch

View all →