Remington Yellow Jacket vs Viper vs Golden Bullet Ballistic Gel Test & Review

This YouTube video conducts a consistency and reliability test of Remington Golden Bullet .22lr ammunition. The reviewer uses a chronograph and ballistic gel to analyze the performance of the bulk pack ammo, assessing its suitability during an ammunition shortage. The video emphasizes responsible firearm handling and ownership, stating that all shooting is done on a private range under controlled conditions. Affiliate links for eye and ear protection are provided.

This video features a ballistic gel test and chronograph comparison between two .22LR ammunition types: Federal Punch and Remington Viper, utilizing a Ruger 10/22 rifle. The test aims to assess the effectiveness of these affordable rounds during an ammo shortage, with the Federal Punch proving its mettle. The creator emphasizes responsible firearm handling and private range use, and does not sell firearms or ammunition, though an Amazon storefront is linked for general tools and targets. The content is geared towards firearm enthusiasts interested in ammunition performance and rimfire testing.

Buckeye Ballistics conducted a comprehensive .22LR velocity test using three Ruger firearms with varying barrel lengths (3.5", 10", and 18.5") and eight different ammunition types. The test utilized a Caldwell chronograph to gather empirical data, demonstrating how barrel length significantly impacts projectile velocity. The host, exhibiting high authority in rimfire ballistics, noted Remington ammunition's inconsistency during the rigorous testing process.

This YouTube video conducts a ballistic gel test comparing two .22lr hollow-point ammunition types: Federal Punch and Remington Yellow Jacket. The test is performed using a Taurus TX22 pistol. The video aims to evaluate the terminal performance of these self-defense rounds, specifically focusing on their penetration and expansion capabilities. The description also includes disclaimers about safe shooting practices and notes the absence of direct sales links for firearms or ammunition.

This review from Moondog 2A compares the fouling left by Aguila Super Extra HV .22 LR ammunition against CCI Mini-Mag and Remington Golden Bullet. The test protocol involved firing 25 rounds from a Walther P22, followed by a dry patch, brushing, and thorough cleaning. Aguila Super Extra HV was found to be dirtier than CCI Mini-Mag but cleaner than Remington Golden Bullet, with physical debris analysis suggesting buffer materials in Aguila's gunpowder.

This video features chronograph testing of the 8-inch barrel Ruger Charger, a non-takedown variant of the Ruger 10/22. The testing compares suppressed and unsuppressed performance across several .22 LR ammunition types, including Remington Golden Bullet, Aguila Standard Velocity Pistol Match, Aguila Subsonic, CCI Suppressor, and CCI Quiet Semi-Auto. Velocities were measured at 7 yards using a Caldwell Ballistic Precision chronograph. The video notes that all tested loads functioned reliably with Ruger OEM 10-round rotary magazines.

This video compares the terminal performance of five common pistol calibers (.22LR, .380 ACP, 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP) by shooting watermelons. The test demonstrates a significant increase in destructive power from .22LR up to .45 ACP, with the larger calibers causing more explosive expansion and fragmentation. Specific hollow-point ammunition from Speer, Aguila, and Underwood was used, highlighting the importance of bullet construction for terminal ballistics.

Buckeye Ballistics conducted a comparative test of common pistol calibers (.22LR, .380 ACP, 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP) against concrete blocks. The host, demonstrating significant firearm and ballistics knowledge, emphasized extreme safety precautions due to ricochet risks. The test revealed that while larger calibers showed more damage, none could fully penetrate the concrete block's second wall, suggesting limitations for self-defense scenarios against hardened barriers.

This Taurus TX22 review details its performance with various .22 LR ammunition. While initially reliable with CCI Mini-Mags and cycling standard velocity rounds well, it encountered malfunctions with sub-sonic and high-velocity loads. A catastrophic failure occurred due to a squib load followed by a second shot, resulting in a bulged barrel and damaged magazine.

This video compares the terminal ballistics of .22LR, .22WMR, and .17HMR rimfire cartridges using cantaloupes as targets. The .22LR showed a clean pass-through with minor damage, the .22WMR caused an explosive front-face disintegration, and the .17HMR, despite its speed, disintegrated internally with no exit. The test highlights how different rimfire rounds perform on soft tissue simulants.