Scorpion EVO vs Sig MPX - Which would I choose?

Published on September 28, 2015
Duration: 30:26

This review compares the CZ Scorpion EVO and Sig Sauer MPX 9mm platforms, highlighting their differences in suppressors, ammunition testing, ergonomics, and maintenance. The Scorpion EVO is favored for its affordability, simplicity, and suppressed shooting experience, despite minor ergonomic drawbacks. The MPX offers AR-like ergonomics but comes with a higher price tag and more complex maintenance.

Quick Summary

The CZ Scorpion EVO is chosen over the Sig Sauer MPX due to its lower cost (~$789 vs ~$1249), greater reliability from its simpler design, and a more pleasant suppressed shooting experience without the MPX's heavy gas blowback.

Chapters

  1. 00:10Introduction: Scorpion EVO vs Sig MPX
  2. 01:21Suppressor Threading Comparison
  3. 02:30Subsonic Ammunition Testing
  4. 10:24CZ Scorpion EVO Analysis (Pros & Cons)
  5. 13:03Sig Sauer MPX Analysis (Pros & Cons)
  6. 16:03Field Strip Comparison
  7. 16:44Final Verdict & Choice

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main differences between the CZ Scorpion EVO and Sig Sauer MPX?

The CZ Scorpion EVO is more affordable, simpler, and generally more reliable, especially when suppressed. The Sig MPX offers better AR-like ergonomics and ambidextrous controls but is more expensive and complex, with potential issues like loose barrel bolts.

Which 9mm PCC is better for suppressed shooting, the Scorpion EVO or the MPX?

The CZ Scorpion EVO is generally preferred for suppressed shooting. Its simpler blowback operation results in less gas blowback compared to the MPX's gas piston system, making it more pleasant to shoot with a suppressor attached.

What are the key pros and cons of the CZ Scorpion EVO?

Pros include its lightweight polymer build, affordable $22 magazines, and excellent paddle magazine release. Cons are a safety selector that can irritate the trigger finger and a redundant bolt release system.

What are the key pros and cons of the Sig Sauer MPX?

Pros include familiar AR-15 ergonomics and full ambidextrous controls. Cons are expensive $69 magazines, a proprietary non-ambidextrous charging handle, and potential issues with barrel retention bolts vibrating loose.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from Military Arms Channel

View all →