Semiauto M2 Hyde Reproduction: The Interim US WW2 Subgun

Published on January 9, 2019
Duration: 16:28

This guide covers the handling and range testing of a semi-automatic M2 Hyde reproduction, drawing insights from Ian McCollum's analysis. It details visual inspection points, operational familiarization, and the shooting experience, noting differences from original submachine guns due to its semi-auto nature and reproduction components. The M2 Hyde is presented as a historically significant interim design between the Thompson and Grease Gun.

Quick Summary

The M2 Hyde was an interim US WWII submachine gun designed for improved accuracy and lighter weight than the Thompson. However, production delays and the cost-effectiveness of the M3 Grease Gun led to its limited adoption, with only a few hundred original units made. Reproductions often feature modifications for semi-automatic function and legal compliance.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction to the M2 Hyde
  2. 00:51Early Development and Testing
  3. 02:45Adoption and Performance
  4. 04:39Production Delays and Obsolescence
  5. 08:12Reproduction Features
  6. 10:10Sights and Magazine Compatibility
  7. 12:09Range Testing
  8. 14:39Rarity and Conclusion

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the M2 Hyde's role in US military history?

The M2 Hyde served as an interim submachine gun design during World War II, intended to bridge the gap between the older Thompson models and the newer, more cost-effective M3 Grease Gun. It aimed for improved accuracy and lighter weight.

Why was the M2 Hyde ultimately not mass-produced?

Despite its technical advantages in accuracy, the M2 Hyde faced significant production delays due to manufacturing challenges, particularly with new metal sintering processes. By the time production began, the M3 Grease Gun was ready and offered a more economical solution for mass wartime needs.

How does the M2 Hyde reproduction differ from the original?

The semi-automatic reproduction typically features a barrel extension to meet legal length requirements and often uses an AR-15 trigger group with different internal springs, making its handling more akin to a carbine than an original submachine gun.

What were the key performance differences between the M2 Hyde and the Thompson?

In testing, the M2 Hyde demonstrated significantly better accuracy than the Thompson, achieving 100% hits on a 6x6 target at 50 yards in full-auto, compared to the Thompson's 50% hit rate under similar conditions.

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from Forgotten Weapons

View all →