*test* OLD GUN vs NEW ARMOR (m1 carbine) #gun #demolitionranch #fullautofriday #bodyarmor

Published on December 21, 2022
Duration: 0:55

This test demonstrates the effectiveness of modern Level 3A+ body armor against a WWII M1 Carbine firing .30 Carbine rounds. Despite significant back face deformation and visible damage to the armor, it successfully stopped the projectile and its fragments. The comparison highlights the advancements in personal protective equipment over historical military firearms.

Quick Summary

A WWII M1 Carbine firing .30 Carbine rounds was tested against Level 3A+ Battle Steel body armor. The armor successfully stopped the projectile, though it sustained heavy damage and showed significant back face deformation on the backing board.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: M1 Carbine vs Body Armor
  2. 00:08Test Setup: Back Face Deformation
  3. 00:17The Shot: M1 Carbine Firing
  4. 00:32Results: Armor Integrity and Fragments
  5. 00:47Conclusion: Armor Wins

Frequently Asked Questions

What type of firearm was used to test the body armor?

The test utilized a World War II era M1 Carbine, chambered in .30 Carbine caliber. This historical rifle was fired at modern body armor to assess its protective capabilities.

Did the M1 Carbine penetrate the Level 3A+ body armor?

No, the Level 3A+ Battle Steel body armor successfully stopped the .30 Carbine round fired from the M1 Carbine. While the armor was heavily damaged and deformed, it prevented penetration.

What was observed after the M1 Carbine round impacted the armor?

Significant back face deformation was observed on the particle board behind the armor, indicating substantial energy transfer. Bullet fragments were also recovered from the damaged vest.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from Civilian Tactical

View all →