The Forgotten 3-Shot Grenade Launcher Before the M79: The T148E1 with expert Jonathan Ferguson

Published on April 22, 2026
Duration: 30:13

This video provides an in-depth look at the T148E1, a three-shot grenade launcher developed by Springfield Armory in the 1950s. Expert Jonathan Ferguson details its design, mechanism, and historical context, highlighting its contemporary development alongside the M79 and explaining why it ultimately did not see widespread adoption. The T148E1 featured a unique 'negator spring' system for automatic advancement of the firing chamber and utilized the 40x46mm high-low pressure round.

Quick Summary

The T148E1 was an experimental three-shot grenade launcher developed in the 1950s, predating the M79. It utilized a unique 'negator spring' mechanism for automatic chamber advancement and fired the 40x46mm high-low pressure round. Despite its innovative design, it was ultimately deemed too complex and fragile compared to the simpler M79.

Chapters

  1. 00:03Introduction to the T148E1
  2. 00:16Myth Busting: T148E1 vs. M79
  3. 01:05Multi-Shot Requirement
  4. 01:37Deep Dive into the T148E1 Story
  5. 01:52Springfield Armory and Design Origin
  6. 02:24Designer: Lt. Col. Roy E. Rail
  7. 03:07Experimental Designation (T prefix)
  8. 03:23Confusion with M79 Development Timeline
  9. 03:54Context: 40mm Grenade Round Development
  10. 04:14Project Niblick and Early Testing
  11. 04:2540x46mm High-Low Pressure System Explained
  12. 05:57Early Multi-Shot and Single-Shot Concepts
  13. 06:05Recoil Requirement: 12 Gauge Shotgun
  14. 07:05Initial Launch Concepts (Pistol, Sled Fixture)
  15. 07:31Engineers: Sai Moore and Dave Catz
  16. 07:52Physical Dimensions and Weight
  17. 08:48Materials: Aluminum Barrel and Receiver
  18. 09:05Furniture and Sights
  19. 09:53Purpose: Extending Grenade Range
  20. 10:16Arctic Trigger Guard
  21. 10:37Sliding Action and Grip Safety
  22. 11:05Manual Safety Mechanism
  23. 11:47Double Safety System Importance
  24. 11:59Markings: Springfield Armory, T148E1
  25. 12:35Optic Dovetail and Unity Site
  26. 13:12Mechanism: The Feed Device (Clip/Magazine)
  27. 13:30Negator Spring Operation
  28. 14:23Magazine Removal Mechanism
  29. 15:34Barrel Rifling
  30. 15:55Firing Pin Aperture
  31. 16:18Self-Contained Double-Action Mechanism
  32. 17:13Practical Operation: Loading and Firing
  33. 17:23Loading Rounds into the Feed Device
  34. 18:00Manual Ejection of Cases
  35. 18:46Automatic Chamber Advancement
  36. 18:56Lever Mechanism for Advancement
  37. 19:37Demonstrating Advancement Mechanism
  38. 20:27Simulated Firing Sequence
  39. 21:22Semi-Automatic Fire Definition
  40. 21:41Reloading the Feed Device
  41. 22:15Butt Plate and Recoil Pad Variations
  42. 22:33T148E2 Variant
  43. 23:26T148E2 Clip System Changes
  44. 23:40Trials at Bradley Fields
  45. 23:45Pistol Deemed Inaccurate
  46. 23:53Three-Shot Launcher Accuracy Issues
  47. 24:07Reason for Varying Muzzle Velocity
  48. 24:11Lateral Balance and Point of Impact Shift
  49. 24:59Reasons for Abandonment: Fragility and Open Action
  50. 25:56Navy SEALs Experimentation
  51. 26:07Army Rangers with T148E1
  52. 26:20Vietnam Era Testing
  53. 26:48XM79 vs. T148E1 Development Path
  54. 26:52T148E2 Emergence and Mothballing
  55. 27:00Re-testing in 1963 (Mounted Version)
  56. 27:16Brief Vietnam Traction
  57. 27:41Roy Rail's Concerns (1955)
  58. 27:53Break-Open Design Leads to XM79
  59. 28:05M79's Success Factors
  60. 28:23Pop Culture References
  61. 28:33Incorporation into Video Games
  62. 29:07Future of Multi-Shot Grenade Launchers
  63. 29:33Conclusion and Call to Action

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the T148E1 grenade launcher?

The T148E1 was an experimental three-shot grenade launcher developed by Springfield Armory in the 1950s. It was designed to fire the 40x46mm high-low pressure round and featured a unique 'negator spring' mechanism for automatic chamber advancement.

How did the T148E1 differ from the M79?

The T148E1 was a multi-shot (three-round) design, whereas the M79 was a single-shot break-action launcher. While developed concurrently, the M79's simplicity, robustness, and reliability ultimately led to its widespread adoption over the T148E1's more complex system.

What was the purpose of the 'negator spring' in the T148E1?

The 'negator spring' in the T148E1 was a coiled strip of metal responsible for automatically advancing the firing chamber to the next round after each shot. This mechanism enabled the launcher to function in a semi-automatic manner.

Why was the T148E1 ultimately unsuccessful?

The T148E1 was deemed too fragile, with an action too exposed to the elements, making it prone to jamming. Additionally, issues with lateral balance changing the point of impact shot-to-shot contributed to its abandonment in favor of simpler designs like the M79.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from Royal Armouries

View all →