Why Glocks Suck!!!

Published on February 13, 2017
Duration: 18:31

This review critically examines Glocks, highlighting areas for improvement despite their reliability. The video discusses mediocre stock triggers and sights, proprietary rails, and potential handling issues like slide bite. It also touches on caliber-specific wear and ergonomic critiques, comparing Glocks to competitors like Walther and Canik.

Quick Summary

Common criticisms of Glock pistols include mediocre stock triggers and sights, a proprietary accessory rail, and ergonomic issues like grip angle and small controls. While the 'Glocknade' failure myth is rare, .40 S&W models may wear faster.

Chapters

  1. 00:18Introduction & Disclaimer
  2. 01:56Aesthetics & Durability Myths
  3. 03:19Trigger & Sights
  4. 05:50Proprietary Rails & Fanboyism
  5. 07:08Handling & Reliability Issues
  6. 08:34Caliber Wear & Finish
  7. 10:51Value & Ergonomics

Frequently Asked Questions

What are common criticisms of Glock pistols?

Common criticisms include mediocre stock triggers and sights, a proprietary accessory rail that isn't Picatinny standard, and ergonomic issues like grip angle and small controls. Some .40 S&W models also experience faster wear.

Are Glocks prone to catastrophic failure ('Glocknade')?

The 'Glocknade' myth is largely considered rare. Catastrophic frame failures are uncommon and usually caused by faulty ammunition, not inherent design flaws in most modern Glocks.

What are the main ergonomic complaints about Glocks?

Users often cite the grip angle, blocky slide profile, lack of front serrations, and small controls like the slide release and takedown tabs as ergonomic drawbacks.

How do Glock triggers compare to other brands?

The stock Glock trigger is generally considered mediocre when compared to competitors like Walther or Canik, which often offer smoother or crisper trigger pulls out of the box.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from Honest Outlaw

View all →