308 vs 30-06 vs 7.62x54R: Not Even Close?

This guide, presented with the authority of an experienced instructor, outlines a strategic approach to stockpiling ammunition in anticipation of potential shortages. It details specific calibers like .22 LR, 9mm, .223/5.56, 12-gauge, 7.62x39mm, and .308, explaining why each is critical and how supply chain issues and demand affect their availability. The advice emphasizes building a diverse inventory to ensure preparedness for various scenarios.

This guide details the setup and live-fire testing of Arrakis steel targets, featuring insights from Ozzie Reviews. It covers the installation of various centerfire and rimfire targets, including reactive plates and gong systems, and emphasizes their durability with specific steel grades like Bisalloy 500 and Hardox 450. The review highlights the practical application for hunting practice and general range use, with expert commentary on their Australian manufacturing quality.

This video provides a data-driven comparison between the .308 Winchester and 7.62x39mm calibers, specifically testing their performance from short barrels (16 inches) out to 100 yards. The host, demonstrating high expertise with ballistics, uses a LabRadar chronograph to collect precise velocity and energy data, concluding that the .308 Winchester significantly outperforms the 7.62x39mm even in shorter configurations.

This video provides a comparative analysis between the Mosin Nagant and the M1 Garand, highlighting their operational differences, calibers, and historical contexts. The host, identified as a firearms enthusiast and content creator, offers insights into platform-specific quirks like the Mosin's bayonet and the M1 Garand's 'Garand Thumb' phenomenon. The M1 Garand is ultimately favored for its caliber and overall design.

This guide details a comprehensive testing methodology for specialized ammunition, specifically focusing on a detonator-loaded bullet. It outlines a step-by-step process for evaluating its performance against various targets, from soft tissue simulants to hard materials, using standard FMJ rounds as a baseline. The expert-level approach emphasizes meticulous documentation, velocity measurement, and analysis of impact effects to understand the unique destructive capabilities of such ammunition.

This video from Banana Ballistics provides a detailed comparison of cartridges derived from the .30-06 Springfield case, including the .25-06 Remington, .270 Winchester, .280 Ackley Improved, and .35 Whelen. Through rigorous testing against various materials like lumber, steel, concrete, and sand, the host demonstrates the performance differences in terms of penetration and impact energy. The .35 Whelen emerges as the clear winner in penetration, while the .30-06 Springfield and its derivatives show varying degrees of effectiveness, offering valuable data for handloaders and shooters seeking optimal performance for specific applications.

This video provides an expert-level comparison between the .44 Magnum and .50 Action Express calibers, featuring a Magnum Research Desert Eagle and a Ruger Super Redhawk. The host, demonstrating high authority, conducts a series of tests including penetration through lumber, steel, sand, and concrete, followed by ballistic gel testing with hollow-point rounds. The analysis highlights differences in muzzle energy, penetration, and wound channel, ultimately questioning the cost-to-performance ratio of the .50 AE.

This video provides an in-depth, experimental comparison between .223 Remington and 5.56x45mm NATO cartridges, utilizing a chronograph and various barrier materials. The host, demonstrating high expertise through empirical testing, reveals significant performance differences, particularly in barrier penetration, with 5.56x45mm NATO generally outperforming .223 Remington.

This video from Banana Ballistics explores the surprising lethality of "less lethal" shotgun ammunition. Through rigorous testing with ballistic gel and plywood, the host demonstrates that rounds like bean bags and high-velocity .410 rubber buckshot can cause significant damage, challenging the common perception of these rounds as entirely non-lethal. The testing highlights the importance of understanding ammunition performance beyond its intended classification.

This video provides an objective comparison of 9mm Luger, .40 S&W, and .45 ACP calibers through a series of rigorous tests including lumber, sand, concrete, and ballistics gel. The host, leveraging specialized equipment like a Garmin Xero C1 Pro chronograph and digital calipers, presents data on velocity, penetration, and expansion. While .40 S&W showed competitive performance in some tests, the analysis concludes with a preference for 9mm due to its higher capacity and lower recoil, highlighting the importance of practical considerations beyond raw ballistics.