Comparing some of the top enclosed pistol optics: The Steiner MPS vs The Aimpoint ACRO P-2

Published on April 24, 2024
Duration: 9:32

This video provides a detailed comparison between the Steiner MPS and Aimpoint ACRO P-2 enclosed pistol optics. The presenter, Brandon from Tap Rack Bang Training, discusses durability, battery placement and life, optic window size, deck height implications for co-witnessing iron sights, brightness, and price. He highlights the ACRO P-2's superior brightness and battery life, while the Steiner MPS offers a lower deck height and a potentially more accessible adjustment mechanism, though it suffers from an auto-shutoff feature that limits its highest brightness setting and a shorter real-world battery life.

Quick Summary

The Steiner MPS and Aimpoint ACRO P-2 are top enclosed pistol optics. The ACRO P-2 offers superior brightness and battery life (50,000 hrs vs 13,000 hrs), while the MPS has a lower deck height for better iron sight co-witness. The MPS also features a top-mounted battery and a controversial auto-shutoff, whereas the ACRO P-2 has a left-side battery compartment.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: Steiner MPS vs Aimpoint ACRO P-2
  2. 00:22Durability and Round Count
  3. 01:00Steiner MPS Clamp Screw Concerns
  4. 01:41Battery Compartment Location
  5. 02:15Optic Window Size Comparison
  6. 02:33Deck Height and Iron Sight Co-witness
  7. 03:55Clarity of the Optic
  8. 04:08Brightness Settings and Output
  9. 04:28Brightness Setting Details (ACRO vs MPS)
  10. 04:40Steiner MPS Auto-Shutoff Feature
  11. 05:43Battery Life Expectations
  12. 06:54Price Point Comparison
  13. 07:34Final Pros and Cons: Aimpoint ACRO P-2
  14. 07:56Final Pros and Cons: Steiner MPS
  15. 08:00Adjustment Mechanism Comparison
  16. 09:15Conclusion and Recommendation

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main differences between the Steiner MPS and Aimpoint ACRO P-2 enclosed pistol optics?

Key differences include battery compartment location (top for Steiner, left for Aimpoint), optic window size (slightly larger on Aimpoint), deck height (lower on Steiner, aiding iron sight co-witness), brightness output (Aimpoint is brighter), and battery life (Aimpoint significantly longer advertised life). The Steiner also has a controversial auto-shutoff feature.

Which enclosed pistol optic is more durable, the Steiner MPS or Aimpoint ACRO P-2?

Both optics are considered very durable. The presenter has put 5,000-6,000 rounds through the Steiner MPS with no lens damage or cracks, despite significant holster wear. The Aimpoint ACRO P-2 has seen less use but also shows no signs of wear. The Steiner's clamp screw has been a point of concern online, but proper torquing seems to mitigate issues.

How does the deck height of the Steiner MPS and Aimpoint ACRO P-2 affect iron sight co-witnessing?

The Steiner MPS has a lower deck height, making it easier to see and co-witness with backup iron sights, especially on platforms like the Glock MOS or when using adapter plates. The Aimpoint ACRO P-2 sits slightly higher, which can obscure iron sights without specific mounting solutions or a dedicated plate.

What are the battery life and brightness advantages of the Aimpoint ACRO P-2 over the Steiner MPS?

The Aimpoint ACRO P-2 boasts a much longer advertised battery life of 50,000 hours compared to the Steiner MPS's 13,000 hours. Additionally, the ACRO P-2 produces a brighter red dot, offering better visibility in harsh daylight conditions, and has more brightness settings.

Related News

All News →

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from Tap Rack Bang, LLC

View all →