EOTECH vs Delta Point Pro

Published on May 13, 2024
Duration: 0:41

This video compares the EOTECH optic with the Delta Point Pro for a SIG P320/M17 build, highlighting the trade-offs. The EOTECH was chosen for its perceived quality, but it results in the loss of the pistol's factory rear iron sights. The speaker notes that SIG's integrated optic plates, which retain iron sights, are significantly more expensive than the firearm itself.

Quick Summary

When building with an EOTECH optic on a SIG P320/M17, a primary consideration is the loss of factory rear iron sights. While SIG offers integrated plates that retain sights, they are exceptionally expensive at around $700.

Chapters

  1. 00:00SIG P320/M17 Iron Sights
  2. 00:11Optic Choice for Build
  3. 00:19EOTECH Selection
  4. 00:23Losing Rear Iron Sights
  5. 00:27SIG Optic Plate Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the pros and cons of using an EOTECH optic on a SIG P320/M17?

The EOTECH is chosen for its perceived quality in builds. However, a significant downside is the loss of the pistol's factory rear iron sights when the optic is mounted. This is a key consideration for firearm builds.

Are there optic plates available for SIG P320/M17 that retain iron sights?

Yes, SIG offers optic plates that integrate rear iron sights. However, these are noted to be extremely expensive, with one option costing around $700, making them more costly than the firearm itself.

Why might someone choose an EOTECH over a Delta Point Pro for a SIG P320/M17 build?

The speaker indicates a preference for the EOTECH's quality for their specific build, suggesting it offers a perceived advantage over the Delta Point Pro in this context. This choice is often based on brand reputation and specific performance expectations.

Related News

All News →

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from Elliott Delp

View all →