Grayguns and GBRS are not to be trusted

Published on August 16, 2025
Duration: 10:58

This video critically examines the actions of Grey Guns and GBRS Group concerning the Sig Sauer P320. It reveals a 2017 patent assignment where Grey Guns sold a safety mechanism design to Sig Sauer, contradicting public statements by Bruce Gray at the time that the P320 had no safety issues. The video also scrutinizes GBRS Group's defense of the P320 platform, questioning their financial ties to Sig Sauer and their retraction of a statement after facing backlash.

Quick Summary

A 2017 patent assignment reveals Grey Guns sold a P320 safety mechanism design to Sig Sauer, contradicting public statements by Bruce Gray that the pistol had no safety issues. This, along with GBRS Group's defense and subsequent retraction of statements about the P320, raises significant questions about influencer credibility and transparency in the firearms industry.

Chapters

  1. 00:01Introduction: SIG Related Content
  2. 00:20Patent Document: Grey Guns & Sig Sauer
  3. 00:41Patent Assignment Details
  4. 01:44Sig P320 Voluntary Upgrade Context
  5. 02:28Timeline Discrepancy: Bruce Gray's Statements
  6. 03:06Criticism of Bruce Gray's Credibility
  7. 04:04Viewer Comments on Grey Guns
  8. 04:24Sig Sauer's Legal Arguments
  9. 05:04Lack of Shock Regarding Bruce Gray's Actions
  10. 05:11Importance of Admitting Mistakes
  11. 05:30Questioning Bruce Gray's Bias
  12. 06:00Shifting Verbiage from Sig Sauer
  13. 06:28Trusting Influencers and Brands
  14. 06:33Influencer Shifts: Sig to Wilson Combat
  15. 06:41Analogy for Deceptive Practices
  16. 07:00GBRS Group Blocked on Instagram
  17. 07:21GBRS Instagram Story Analysis
  18. 07:41GBRS Statement on P320 Defense
  19. 08:15Speaker's Disbelief in GBRS Claims
  20. 08:31GBRS Retracting Statement
  21. 08:46Viewer Comments on GBRS
  22. 09:00Transparency in Sponsorship
  23. 09:14Deceptive Practices by Influencers
  24. 09:21Specific Figures for GBRS Payments
  25. 09:37Word Game: 'Not Paid to Endorse'
  26. 10:05Sig Sauer Sponsorships
  27. 10:12P320 as a Duty Gun Competitor
  28. 10:17Navy SEALs and P226/P320 Training
  29. 10:34Critique of Grip Angle Argument
  30. 10:38Financial Motivation for Endorsements
  31. 10:44Conclusion: SIG Influencer Discussion

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the core controversy surrounding Grey Guns and the Sig Sauer P320?

The controversy stems from a 2017 patent assignment where Grey Guns sold a safety mechanism design to Sig Sauer, while its principal, Bruce Gray, publicly claimed the P320 had no safety issues. This contradiction raises questions about transparency and credibility.

Why is GBRS Group being criticized in relation to the Sig Sauer P320?

GBRS Group is criticized for defending the Sig Sauer P320 platform, particularly after an incident, while their statements about not being paid by Sig Sauer are met with skepticism. Their subsequent removal of a defense post after backlash further fuels these doubts.

What was the Sig Sauer P320 voluntary upgrade about?

The voluntary upgrade addressed concerns about the P320's trigger actuating and firing when dropped at specific angles. Sig Sauer implemented changes, including adjusting trigger weight, to mitigate this issue, a problem Grey Guns had previously patented a solution for.

What does the video suggest about the financial motivations of firearm influencers?

The video suggests that firearm influencers may be financially compensated by manufacturers like Sig Sauer, leading to biased endorsements. It highlights a perceived lack of transparency and criticizes deceptive marketing practices within the industry.

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from Ben Stoeger

View all →