Inforce APLc The Best New Weapon Light 2017 Review: Surefire X300 Ultra & XC1 Comparison

Published on June 27, 2017
Duration: 15:43

This review compares the Inforce APLc weapon light to the Surefire XC1 and X300 Ultra, focusing on their suitability for concealed carry and general use. The Inforce APLc is highlighted for its ease of use, ambidextrous controls, and a more favorable beam pattern for general observation compared to the XC1. Despite the XC1's smaller size, the APLc offers a better user experience and more consistent battery life, addressing a key drawback of the XC1. The X300 Ultra is acknowledged for its superior lumen output and throw but is deemed less practical for concealed carry due to its size.

Quick Summary

The Inforce APLc weapon light is praised for its superior ambidextrous controls, reliable battery life, and usable beam pattern, making it a strong contender for concealed carry and home defense. It addresses key drawbacks of the Surefire XC1, such as battery drain and rail flex, while offering a more comfortable user experience than larger lights like the X300 Ultra.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction & Overview
  2. 00:19First Impressions & Comparisons
  3. 00:51Why Choose a Mini Light (Concealed Carry)
  4. 01:44APLc Stats & Testing Experience
  5. 02:01APLc Controls: Momentary & Constant On
  6. 02:36Control Ease Comparison
  7. 02:44Lumens & Beam Pattern Comparison
  8. 03:07Throw Distance Comparison
  9. 03:33Runtime & Battery Life
  10. 03:51XC1 Battery Drain Issues
  11. 04:17Weight Comparison
  12. 04:25Mounting System Comparison
  13. 05:10APLc Mounting Screw Issue
  14. 06:08Mounting APLc on CZ P-10C
  15. 06:32APLc Rail Grip Tightness
  16. 06:54Surefire XC1 Falling Off
  17. 07:00XC1 Rail Flex Issue
  18. 07:41APLc No Rail Flex Issue
  19. 07:52Size Comparison: APLc vs XC1
  20. 08:38Bezel Diameter Comparison
  21. 08:59Material Comparison: Polymer vs Aluminum
  22. 09:11Durability Expectations
  23. 09:43Use Cases: Home Defense & Coyote Hunting
  24. 10:07Field of View & Brightness Preference
  25. 10:23XC1 Durability vs Battery Failure
  26. 10:45APLc Ease of Use & Battery Life
  27. 11:15Overall Verdict: APLc is Better
  28. 11:36Long-Term Review Caveats
  29. 12:11Accidental Discharge Risk
  30. 13:00Price Comparison
  31. 13:27Conclusion: Best Pistol Light?
  32. 14:05X300 Ultra as a Benchmark
  33. 14:34Controls Preference
  34. 14:48Unique Testing Environment
  35. 15:08Call to Action & Outro

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main advantages of the Inforce APLc weapon light?

The Inforce APLc offers superior ambidextrous controls that are easier to operate than Surefire's XC1 and X300. It provides a more usable beam pattern for general observation and does not suffer from the battery drain issues that plague the XC1, making it a more reliable option for concealed carry and home defense.

How does the Inforce APLc compare to the Surefire XC1 in terms of size and mounting?

While the Surefire XC1 is slightly smaller and slimmer, the Inforce APLc offers a more stable mounting system that doesn't flex on polymer rails. The APLc's controls are also significantly easier to use, and it avoids the XC1's critical battery drain problem, making it a more practical choice for most users.

What is the primary drawback of the Surefire XC1 weapon light?

The primary drawback of the Surefire XC1 is its significant battery drain issue, often caused by its crossbolt safety mechanism, which can leave the light dead when needed. This unreliability makes it less suitable for critical applications like home defense or concealed carry.

Is the Inforce APLc durable enough for regular use?

The Inforce APLc is constructed from glass-reinforced polymer and is considered durable enough for everyday use, including home defense and general carrying. While it may not withstand extreme abuse like a metal-bodied light, it offers a good balance of durability and weight for its intended applications.

Related News

All News →

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from Honest Outlaw

View all →