Se você é americano, não pode ficar sem isso...

This video showcases the use of a 37mm grenade launcher, specifically the TAC 79, with specialized rounds from the Ordnance Group. The presenter demonstrates two types of rounds: the 'Whistle Pig' and the 'Freedom Round', emphasizing their use for animal control rather than fireworks. The video also briefly touches on ammunition reloading and mentions Squared Ammunition for common ammo needs.

This video demonstrates the use of a 37mm grenade launcher for New Year's celebrations, specifically highlighting two Ordinance Group shells: the 'Whistling Pig' and the 'Freedom Round'. The presenter emphasizes their use for animal control to deter wildlife from crops, not as fireworks. The video also briefly mentions Ammo Squared for regular ammunition reloading.

This video tests three 37mm grenades from Desk Pop, including a 'crackle round' and two unidentified blue rounds. One blue round failed to fire, while another discharged only a few feet with stabilizing fins. The final round's casing blew out, revealing orange chalk, identified as a chalk marker round. The speaker notes the unique 38 Special casing embedded in the base of the blue rounds, contrasting with standard primers.

This video demonstrates the use of chalk projectiles in a 37mm grenade launcher, specifically the Taxi 79 model. The launcher is noted as legal for civilians due to its black powder propellant and lack of rifling. The demonstration highlights the visual effects of chalk rounds, comparing pink and green chalk, and mentions the Amo Square system for automatic ammunition stacking.

This video demonstrates a test of 37mm skittle grenades as less-lethal ammunition for crowd control. Initial tests showed insufficient energy, but adjustments led to effective dispersion and impact. The projectiles were assessed for their ability to deter without causing lethal injury, with impacts on ballistic gel and a water jug analyzed.

This video tests the effectiveness of "rubber duck" projectiles fired from a 37mm T79 grenade launcher as a form of crowd control. The test involves assessing dispersion on paper targets, energy impact on a water jug, and simulated protester engagement using ballistic gelatin heads. While the projectiles showed good dispersion and flew quickly, their energy transfer was insufficient to incapacitate simulated targets, leading to a conclusion that they are not a precise or highly effective crowd control munition.

This video explores the compatibility of a 50 BMG cartridge with a 12 gauge flare gun. The experiment reveals that while the cartridge fits, the flare gun's mechanism cannot ignite the tough 50 BMG primers. However, it successfully fires a standard 12 gauge blank, highlighting the difference in primer hardness. The content is presented from a hobbyist perspective, focusing on experimental curiosity rather than professional instruction.

This video from Tática Civil, featuring an expert instructor, explains the dangers of firing upwards due to projectile drop and terminal velocity. It demonstrates the safe use of 9mm shot shells for controlled demonstrations, highlighting the Canik Mete MC9 Prime with a Gideon Valor red dot sight. The instructor emphasizes crucial firearm safety protocols.

This guide details an experimental test to debunk the myth that a .50 BMG round passing near a target can be lethal. Using a ballistic mannequin, cardboard indicators, and a concrete backstop, the test demonstrates that a near miss from a .50 BMG round does not impart enough shockwave or air pressure to cause fatal injury, though the projectile itself possesses immense kinetic energy as evidenced by its impact on the concrete block. The test was conducted objectively by an individual with high authority, indicated by their empirical testing methods and proper safety protocols.

This video demonstrates a dramatic comparison between the .22 LR and .50 BMG calibers using a ballistic head model. The .50 BMG, when attached to an AR-15 platform via a Raptor upper, shows vastly superior destructive power, completely obliterating the model, while the .22 LR causes only superficial damage. The host's enthusiastic and experimental approach, combined with clear technical explanations, highlights the significant energy difference between these two rounds.