“Which is Quieter?” - 22 vs 38 Suppressed #shorts

Published on July 20, 2024
Duration: 0:41

This video compares the suppressed sound levels of a .22LR firearm against a .38 Special. The presenter, demonstrating expertise with suppressed firearms, finds both calibers surprisingly quiet when suppressed, making a definitive judgment difficult without direct side-by-side audio comparison. Viewers are encouraged to share their opinions.

Quick Summary

A comparison of suppressed .22LR and .38 Special calibers reveals both are remarkably quiet. The presenter found neither required ear protection, making it hard to declare a definitive winner without direct audio comparison. Gear used included a Ruger Mark IV with Dead Air Mask 22 for .22LR, and a G Force Huckleberry with Dead Air Wolfman for .38 Special.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: Caliber Comparison
  2. 00:08.38 Special Suppressed Test
  3. 00:23.22LR Suppressed Test
  4. 00:35Conclusion & Viewer Feedback

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is quieter: a suppressed .22LR or a suppressed .38 Special?

In a direct comparison, both suppressed .22LR and .38 Special calibers proved surprisingly quiet. The presenter found both setups to be so quiet that ear protection wasn't necessary, making a definitive judgment difficult without side-by-side audio analysis.

What firearms and suppressors were used in the .22LR vs .38 Special sound test?

The .38 Special was tested with a G Force Huckleberry rifle and a Dead Air Wolfman suppressor. The .22LR was tested with a Ruger Mark IV SilencerShop edition pistol and a Dead Air Mask 22 suppressor.

Can you shoot a suppressed .38 Special without ear protection?

According to the presenter, a suppressed .38 Special fired from a G Force Huckleberry with a Dead Air Wolfman was quiet enough that ear protection was not required, and no ear ringing was experienced.

Related News

All News →

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from 1st Shot Tactical

View all →