Why The US Army REALLY Said NO To Glock!

Published on March 28, 2024
Duration: 8:04

This analysis delves into why the US Army selected the Sig Sauer P320 (M17/M18) over the Glock 19X for its Modular Handgun System (MHS) trials. Key factors included the P320's true modularity via a removable serialized trigger group, which offered significant cost savings and configuration flexibility, and its compliance with the requirement for a manual thumb safety. The Glock 19X, while a capable firearm, was deemed 'acceptable' rather than 'good' due to its lack of comparable modularity and the added cost of its trial-specific manual safety.

Quick Summary

The US Army rejected the Glock 19X for the MHS trials due to its lack of true modularity compared to the Sig Sauer P320. Sig Sauer's removable trigger group allowed for cost-effective configuration changes between frame sizes, a key requirement the Glock 19X did not fully meet. The P320 also met the manual thumb safety requirement more seamlessly.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction to XM17 MHS Trials
  2. 00:42Army Handgun Requirements
  3. 01:44The Thumb Safety Factor
  4. 02:38Modularity and Cost Analysis
  5. 05:16Conclusion on Glock's Strategy

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did the US Army reject the Glock 19X for the Modular Handgun System (MHS) trials?

The US Army rejected the Glock 19X primarily because it lacked the true modularity offered by the Sig Sauer P320. Sig Sauer's removable trigger group allowed for easy conversion between different frame sizes, a key requirement for cost-effectiveness and adaptability that the Glock 19X did not meet to the same degree.

What were the key requirements of the US Army's XM17 Modular Handgun System (MHS) trials?

The MHS trials demanded high performance, including a 90% hit rate at 50 meters, improved ergonomics, better recoil management, accessory rails, ambidextrous controls, and a reliability standard of 10,000 rounds between failures. A manual thumb safety was also a specific requirement.

How did modularity impact the US Army's decision in the MHS trials?

Modularity was a critical factor. The Sig Sauer P320's removable serialized trigger group allowed one firearm to be configured in multiple sizes (full, mid, compact), significantly reducing costs compared to purchasing separate pistols for each size, which was a major advantage over the Glock 19X.

Was a manual thumb safety a requirement for the US Army's new service pistol?

Yes, a manual thumb safety was a specific requirement for the US Army's XM17 Modular Handgun System (MHS) trials. While the Sig Sauer P320 included this feature, Glock had to add a manual thumb safety to the 19X specifically for the trials, which increased its cost.

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from GFG

View all →