You Guys Won't Believe This 🤯

Published on November 15, 2025
Duration: 0:56

This entry synthesizes insights from the Shawn Ryan Show regarding the detrimental impact of bureaucratic changes to Rules of Engagement (ROE) on military operations. It highlights how restrictions, such as limiting the use of Military Working Dogs and night operations, increased danger for personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan, despite claims to the contrary by leadership. The content emphasizes the critical disconnect between ground-level realities and high-level decision-making.

Quick Summary

Bureaucratic changes to Rules of Engagement (ROE) significantly increased danger for military personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan. Restrictions on vital assets like Military Working Dogs and night operations, despite their tactical benefits, stemmed from non-tactical considerations, leading to compromised safety and mission effectiveness.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Bureaucracy and ROE Changes
  2. 00:05Restrictions on Dogs and Night Ops
  3. 00:24Congressional Oversight Disconnect
  4. 00:44Mission Impact in Iraq and Afghanistan

Frequently Asked Questions

How did changing Rules of Engagement (ROE) affect military operations?

Changing Rules of Engagement (ROE) significantly increased the danger for military personnel on the ground. Bureaucratic decisions often prioritized optics over safety, leading to higher risks and compromised mission effectiveness in combat zones like Iraq and Afghanistan.

What impact did restrictions on Military Working Dogs have?

Restricting the use of Military Working Dogs, often due to local complaints about them being 'unclean,' proved detrimental. These dogs were vital for saving lives nightly, and their limited use increased operational risks for soldiers.

Were night operations restricted, and why?

Yes, night operations were reportedly restricted despite being tactically safer for forces. These restrictions stemmed from bureaucratic directives rather than tactical necessity, hindering operational advantages and potentially increasing soldier exposure.

What disconnect was observed regarding ROE during congressional visits?

During congressional visits, officers often claimed new ROE did not increase danger. However, senior enlisted personnel contradicted this, stating the rules were indeed making missions more dangerous, highlighting a significant gap in perceived operational reality.

Related News

All News →

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from Shawn Ryan Show

View all →