I Hate Horse Stance!

Published on October 25, 2025
Duration: 0:36

This video critiques the 'horse stance' in firearms training, highlighting its tactical disadvantages. John Lovell explains why this stance, with feet side-by-side, hinders recoil management, forward movement, and directional pivots. He advocates for an offset foot position for a more stable and mobile shooting platform.

Quick Summary

The 'horse stance' in shooting, with feet parallel and wide, is tactically ineffective. It hinders recoil management, forward aggression, and directional pivots. An offset foot position is recommended for a more stable and mobile shooting platform.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Intro: Hating the Horse Stance
  2. 00:05Defining the Horse Stance
  3. 00:13Tactical Disadvantages Explained
  4. 00:22Corrective Stance Advice

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is the 'horse stance' bad for shooting?

The horse stance, with feet parallel and wide, is ineffective because it limits recoil management, hinders forward aggression, and restricts directional pivots. This makes it difficult to maintain stability and mobility during shooting.

What is the recommended shooting stance instead of the horse stance?

Instead of the horse stance, an offset foot position is recommended. This provides a more stable and mobile shooting platform, allowing for better recoil control and easier directional changes.

What are the tactical disadvantages of the horse stance?

Tactically, the horse stance is disadvantageous as it compromises recoil management, prevents effective forward movement or aggression, and severely limits the ability to pivot or change direction quickly.

Related News

All News →

More Training & Techniques Videos You Might Like

More from Warrior Poet Society

View all →