Videos tagged with AR-15 Ban

This video discusses the critical legal developments surrounding potential gun bans, specifically focusing on AR-15s and standard-capacity magazines, at the United States Supreme Court. It highlights the filing of significant briefs in cases like Duncan v. Bont and Gator Custom Guns v. Walter Wentz, emphasizing the emergence of a 'split of authority' among lower courts. This split is presented as a key catalyst for the Supreme Court to potentially hear and rule on these high-stakes Second Amendment cases.

This guide synthesizes information on potential firearm legal changes impacting owners by 2026, drawing from expert analysis of legislative trends and regulatory actions. It highlights key areas of concern including microstamping requirements, assault weapon bans, pistol brace regulations, and magazine capacity restrictions across various states and federal levels. Owners are advised to stay informed and prepared for these evolving legal landscapes.

This video from Guns & Gadgets discusses the significant U.S. Department of Justice lawsuit against Washington D.C.'s ban on AR-15 style firearms. The host, with high authority as a 2nd Amendment commentator, explains how the DOJ argues the ban is unconstitutional, citing Supreme Court precedents like Heller and Bruen, and the 'common use' doctrine. The lawsuit's potential to impact similar bans in other states is also highlighted.

This video discusses upcoming Supreme Court conferences on December 5th, focusing on the Duncan v. Bont case concerning magazine capacity and other Second Amendment challenges. It highlights the increasing number of Second Amendment cases reaching the Supreme Court, attributing it to a more favorable court composition and a surge of litigation following the Bruin decision. The discussion also touches on the legal methodology required for Second Amendment cases and the potential for the Supreme Court to clarify existing precedents.

This video analyzes the legal challenge to Illinois's AR-15 ban, focusing on the "common use" doctrine established in Heller and Bruin. It highlights the intervention of Trump's DOJ with an amicus brief supporting gun owners, arguing that AR-15s and standard capacity magazines are protected arms. The case's potential to create a circuit split and reach the Supreme Court is discussed, with implications for similar bans nationwide.

This video provides an in-depth legal analysis of Second Amendment protections, focusing on the 'dangerous and unusual' and 'in common use' tests as interpreted by the Supreme Court. It breaks down the legal arguments surrounding potential bans on semi-automatic rifles like the AR-15, referencing key Supreme Court cases and historical legal traditions. The speaker, identifying as a constitutional attorney and Supreme Court Bar member, aims to equip viewers with sophisticated arguments to defend Second Amendment rights.

This video discusses the legal battle surrounding Cook County's AR-15 ban, specifically the case Vera Montes v. Cook County before the US Supreme Court. It highlights the Seventh Circuit's ruling upholding the ban under the Bibas standard and critiques this standard as a distortion of Supreme Court precedent. The speaker, Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney and member of the Supreme Court Bar, also addresses Cook County's attempt to discredit scholarship cited in the petitioner's brief, particularly articles from the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, and explains the importance of the 'common use' test within the historical tradition analysis of Second Amendment cases.

This live stream discusses recent and potential gun control measures, focusing on California's upcoming ban on Glocks and Glock clones effective January 1, 2026. The speaker, an experienced firearms enthusiast, critiques the logic behind such bans, arguing they are based on illegal modifications rather than inherent firearm flaws. The discussion also covers broader Second Amendment rights, the importance of supporting gun rights organizations, and practical advice on concealed and open carry, including interstate travel considerations and permit acquisition. Additionally, the stream touches upon firearm preferences, maintenance, and the ongoing debate surrounding various firearm types and calibers.

This video discusses a significant oral argument before the entire US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit concerning New Jersey's ban on AR-15 semi-automatic rifles and magazines holding more than 10 rounds. The host, Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney, analyzes the legal arguments presented, focusing on the 'common use' and 'dangerous and unusual' standards derived from the Heller decision. He expresses optimism for a favorable outcome, suggesting the ban may be unconstitutional under the Second Amendment.

This video discusses two major developments impacting Second Amendment rights. First, it covers the confirmation and swearing-in of Professor Jennifer Masden to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, potentially influencing the Cheeseman case regarding New Jersey's AR-15 and magazine bans. Second, it analyzes a video statement from DOJ's Harmy Dylan detailing the department's positions on Second Amendment issues, including their non-appeal of the Ree case injunction on under-21 FFL sales, their support for striking down Illinois's AR-15 ban, and their actions regarding concealed carry permit processing delays.

This video details the Canadian government's firearm confiscation program, initiated through Orders in Council rather than parliamentary debate, impacting over 2,500 firearm models including AR-15 variants. The program is structured in phases, starting with a business inventory buyback and progressing to a nationwide rollout with significantly undervalued compensation for owners. Legal expert Ian Runkle highlights the lack of notice, the broad definition of 'variants,' the ban on handgun transfers, and the potential for severe criminal penalties for non-compliance, drawing parallels to potential future actions in the United States. The discussion also touches on the political motivations behind the bans, the financial implications, and the resistance from law enforcement agencies.

This video provides a detailed analysis of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals' oral arguments in cases challenging Illinois's ban on AR-15s and high-capacity magazines. It highlights the Department of Justice's surprising stance in favor of Second Amendment rights, the procedural history involving Judge Steven McGlin's detailed findings of fact, and the differing judicial philosophies of the panel members, particularly Judges Easterbrook and Brennan, with Judge St. Eve's decision being pivotal. The discussion emphasizes the legal standards for Second Amendment cases, contrasting adjudicatory and legislative facts, and the potential impact of the ruling on gun rights nationwide.