Videos tagged with Carry Laws

The Supreme Court has refused to hear the case of Shenthal v. Raul, which challenged Illinois' ban on carrying firearms on public transit. This decision allows the Illinois ban to stand, meaning licensed carriers are still prohibited from carrying firearms on public transportation in the state. The video argues this ban infringes upon Second Amendment rights and limits self-defense capabilities, especially for daily commuters who rely on public transit.

This video features an expert analysis of the Wolford case and its potential impact on gun rights nationwide. The speaker, demonstrating deep legal and firearms policy knowledge, discusses the oral arguments before the Supreme Court, the specific laws in Hawaii that prompted the case, and the potential ramifications for states like New York. The analysis highlights how restrictive carry laws can undermine Second Amendment protections and the significance of the Bruen decision in this context.

The video discusses the push for national concealed carry reciprocity (HR38) and argues for nationwide constitutional carry as a more complete realization of Second Amendment rights. It highlights that reciprocity alone still requires permits, whereas constitutional carry allows lawful citizens to carry without one. The speaker also touches on global conflicts and their potential impact on domestic security, advocating for an armed citizenry as a deterrent.

This video provides an expert analysis of recent Supreme Court orders concerning Second Amendment cases. The speaker, demonstrating deep knowledge of legal procedures and firearms law, discusses the denial of LaFave v. Fairfax County and the implications for carry laws, particularly regarding 'sensitive places.' The analysis also covers the postponement of other significant cases like Duncan v. Bonta, highlighting the ongoing legal battles for 2A rights.

This video details the extensive and costly process of obtaining concealed carry permits in multiple states for non-residents, highlighting the lack of reciprocity and the significant financial and time investments required. The speakers, Reed Henrix and Jared (Guns & Gadgets), emphasize that this is a 'pay-to-play' system that infringes upon Second Amendment rights, as the process itself acts as a punishment. They detail the specific requirements, fees, and logistical challenges for states like California, New Jersey, Maryland, New York, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and Massachusetts, noting that even after obtaining multiple permits, carry is still prohibited in certain states like Hawaii and Illinois.

This video from Copper Jacket TV discusses recent legislative setbacks for CCW holders in California. Speaker Will critically analyzes the failure of AB 1092 to extend permit validity and the restrictive renewal window imposed by AB 1078. The content highlights the ongoing challenges faced by firearm rights advocates in the state.

This video provides an expert-level analysis of current Second Amendment legal challenges before the Supreme Court, as presented by a subject matter expert in 2A legal news. It details the status of key cases like NAGR v. Lamont and Wolford v. Lopez, critiques the court's pace, and highlights upcoming conference dates crucial for gun rights.

This video features Colion Noir critically analyzing a federal appeals court ruling that found California's ban on open carry unconstitutional. He argues against the 'feeling unsafe' narrative, contrasting it with data from states where open carry is legal. The analysis highlights the legal basis for the ruling, critiques a dissenting opinion, and touches upon the promotion of Second Amendment advocacy merchandise.

This video provides an authoritative analysis of a significant Second Amendment legal victory in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. It details the ruling against California's open-carry ban, citing historical precedent and judicial opinions that highlight the state's 'subterfuge' in denying rights. The analysis emphasizes the strategic impact of this decision on future Second Amendment litigation and contextualizes it within the historical evolution of firearm carry laws in the U.S., including the racially motivated Mulford Act.

This video provides an expert analysis of the Supreme Court's emergency decision to review the Wolford v. Lopez case, which challenges Hawaii's restrictive concealed carry laws. The speaker, demonstrating high authority and expertise in Second Amendment case law, breaks down the legal arguments and the implications for states that have defied the Bruen decision. The analysis highlights the defiance of states like California, Maryland, New York, and New Jersey, and the DOJ's support for the Supreme Court's review.

The Supreme Court has granted emergency review in Wolford v. Lopez, a case challenging Hawaii's law that presumptively prohibits concealed carry on private property open to the public unless explicitly permitted. This case directly addresses state defiance of the Bruin ruling and could determine the future of gun carry rights nationwide, potentially impacting laws in New York, California, and New Jersey.

This discussion analyzes the Supreme Court's decision to take up the Wolford case, focusing on the question of carrying firearms on private property open to the public. It contrasts the Ninth Circuit's rulings in the May and Wolford cases, particularly regarding Hawaii's broader 'vampire rule' compared to California's. The analysis suggests the Court may be using this narrow issue to clarify the 'history, text, and tradition' methodology established in the Bruen decision and to curb lower courts' interpretations.