Armed Attorneys

This video provides a comprehensive explanation of Texas firearms signage laws, differentiating requirements for constitutional carriers versus license holders. It details the implications of various signs, including 305, 4603, 306, 307, 51%, and defunct blue signs, clarifying when they apply and the potential legal consequences of violations. The discussion highlights specific scenarios like open meetings and establishments selling alcohol, offering practical advice for navigating Texas's complex sign landscape.

This video discusses the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari in Gardner v. Maryland, a case that could have provided clarification on interstate firearm reciprocity. The hosts explain the details of Eva Marie Gardner's case, where she was convicted in Maryland for possessing a handgun despite being licensed in Virginia and encountering an aggressive driver. They analyze Maryland's legal arguments and the potential implications of the Supreme Court's decision, particularly concerning the application of the Bruen decision to interstate travel and the historical analysis of firearm regulations.

This video from Armed Attorneys addresses several legal and self-defense questions relevant to firearm owners. Topics include the impact of Operation Chokepoint on credit card purchases of firearms, the validity of out-of-state CCW permits in Texas, the eligibility for constitutional carry after a deferred adjudication, whether bean bag rounds constitute deadly force, self-defense in national parks, and the legal implications of using a firearm without glasses during a home defense scenario. The discussion also touches on Texas charging practices for violent crimes and common self-defense scenarios.

This video from Armed Attorneys discusses the legal justifications for using force during a home invasion scenario. It breaks down the escalating threat posed by an intruder, from initial trespassing to forceful entry, and analyzes the appropriate level of force, including deadly force, that a homeowner may legally employ under various circumstances, referencing concepts like the Castle Doctrine.

This video discusses a new final rule aimed at ending "Operation Chokepoint," a practice where financial regulators could use "reputational risk" as a pretext to de-bank businesses, particularly those in the firearms industry. The rule, effective June 6, 2026, prohibits regulators from discouraging banks from servicing lawful industries based on political, social, or religious views, thereby protecting Second Amendment rights and financial privacy.

This video from Armed Attorneys discusses legal ramifications of using firearms and other weapons in self-defense scenarios. It clarifies that firearms are always considered deadly weapons under Texas law, even when firing blanks, and can lead to charges like aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. The discussion also covers the strategic importance and potential pitfalls of making a brief 'scene statement' to law enforcement immediately after an incident, emphasizing the need for legal counsel. Additionally, the video touches on the use of non-firearm weapons like tactical tomahawks and the complexities of rendering aid after a self-defense engagement.

The Supreme Court has refused to hear the case of Shenthal v. Raul, which challenged Illinois' ban on carrying firearms on public transit. This decision allows the Illinois ban to stand, meaning licensed carriers are still prohibited from carrying firearms on public transportation in the state. The video argues this ban infringes upon Second Amendment rights and limits self-defense capabilities, especially for daily commuters who rely on public transit.

This video from Armed Attorneys discusses the complexities of ballistics evidence in criminal cases, using the Charlie Kirk shooting as a focal point. It explains why bullets may not always match firearms, often due to damage or insufficient markings. The discussion also touches upon the National Integrated Ballistic Information Network (NIBIN) and its limitations, as well as the general unreliability of forensic ballistics in popular media versus reality. The attorneys emphasize that inconclusive ballistics results have low weight in court and that many firearms cases proceed without extensive ballistic evidence.

This video from Armed Attorneys addresses several critical legal and tactical questions for firearm owners. It clarifies the distinction between pistol braces and stocks in the post-rule ATF landscape, discusses the legal risks of brandishing a firearm in self-defense, and analyzes the potential impact of 'no firearms' signs in self-defense scenarios. The discussion also covers the use of night vision in home defense and the legal implications of being charged after a self-defense shooting, as well as the advisability of mounting bayonets on home defense carbines.

This video from Armed Attorneys discusses a road rage incident involving a machete in Houston, Texas, and analyzes the legal implications of self-defense. It emphasizes the importance of filming such encounters, the legal nuances of deadly force, and the specific Texas 'threats as force' law (9.04). The attorneys advise against exiting a vehicle during road rage and explain when the use of a firearm might be legally justified, highlighting the prosecution's perspective and the challenges of proving imminence.

This video debunks the myth of a 50-state license to carry a firearm, explaining that no such permit exists. It clarifies that firearm laws are state-specific and that reciprocity agreements allow for recognition of licenses between states, but travelers must adhere to the laws of the state they are visiting. The discussion also touches on constitutional carry and its limitations when crossing state lines.

This episode of Armed Attorneys discusses legal aspects of self-defense and firearm ownership. Key topics include jury selection when acquainted with legal parties, the legal implications of using a modified Fitz revolver for self-defense, the nuances of using force when exiting one's home during a home invasion, the challenges of self-defense in gun-free zones, and the legality of concealing a firearm's serial number. The discussion emphasizes honesty in court, the potential for unusual firearms to become a focus in trials, and the importance of understanding state-specific laws.