Videos tagged with Jury Selection

This episode of Armed Attorneys discusses legal aspects of self-defense and firearm ownership. Key topics include jury selection when acquainted with legal parties, the legal implications of using a modified Fitz revolver for self-defense, the nuances of using force when exiting one's home during a home invasion, the challenges of self-defense in gun-free zones, and the legality of concealing a firearm's serial number. The discussion emphasizes honesty in court, the potential for unusual firearms to become a focus in trials, and the importance of understanding state-specific laws.

This video features Professor Mark Smith discussing the intricacies of the Trump hush money case in New York City, focusing on judicial processes and jury selection. Smith aims to provide viewers with in-depth knowledge to understand the trial's 'geeky details.' The content draws a parallel between legal proceedings and the 'four boxes' of American liberty: soap box, ballot box, jury box, and ammunition box. The description highlights Smith's background as a constitutional attorney, professor, and author with a strong focus on Second Amendment rights and anti-gun lobby analysis.

This video discusses the legal ramifications of using deadly force in self-defense, emphasizing that even a legally justified act can lead to significant legal trouble. It highlights the importance of establishing the privilege to use deadly force, the challenges posed by fights without decisive moments, and the potential for public perception and jury bias to influence outcomes. The discussion stresses that while the law may support the use of force, the practical application within the justice system can be complex and unpredictable.

This Q&A session with Kevin Michalowski of USCCA covers various self-defense and firearm-related topics. Key takeaways include the tactical flashlight as a versatile alternative weapon, the importance of understanding local carry laws, and the legal nuances of using deadly force. The discussion also touches on brandishing, ATF interactions, and the legal status of pets as property.

Instructor Mike discusses the criminal trial process, emphasizing the importance of legal services like CCW Safe for self-defense encounters. He contrasts CCW Safe with USCCA, highlighting CCW Safe's model based on police unions. The video details stages from arrest to trial, including the pre-charge phase, discovery, plea negotiations, and jury selection, with insights from legal professionals Don West and Sean Vincent.

This video discusses concerns surrounding Kyle Rittenhouse's defense team, specifically highlighting the departure of attorney Robert Barnes and his assembled 'dream team.' The speaker expresses apprehension that the current legal representation, led by Mark Richards, may not be as effective, citing Richards' political affiliation and perceived lack of trial success. The video also touches on issues related to the fundraising for Rittenhouse's defense and the management of those funds.

This video discusses two key pre-trial rulings by Judge Bruce Schroeder in the Kyle Rittenhouse case. The judge ruled that prosecutors cannot refer to the individuals Rittenhouse shot as 'victims,' instead mandating they be called 'complaining witnesses.' Additionally, the defense is permitted to refer to these individuals as 'arsonists,' 'looters,' and 'rioters' if evidence supports such claims. These rulings are presented as significant victories for Rittenhouse's defense team.

This video features attorney Michele Byington discussing the legal aftermath of a self-defense shooting. Key takeaways include the importance of immediately securing safety, calling 911 first, and being cautious with statements to law enforcement due to their recorded nature and potential use in court. The discussion also touches on how firearm modifications can be perceived by prosecutors and the critical role of jury selection (V Drire) in a self-defense trial.

This video likely discusses the legal obligations and requirements of jury duty. While the title is direct and no specific firearm mentions are present in the provided data, the context of jury duty can sometimes intersect with discussions about firearms ownership and the legal rights of citizens, particularly in the United States. It's possible the content touches on disqualifications for jury service or the legal ramifications for individuals summoned.