This video argues for the right of civilians to own body armor, drawing parallels from historical laws in England and colonial America that mandated citizens possess arms and armor. It asserts that the Second Amendment, as interpreted by the Supreme Court in DC v. Heller, protects 'armor of defense' alongside weapons of offense, making modern body armor a contemporary equivalent. The presenter emphasizes that owning defensive equipment is a civic duty and a protected right, not a privilege to be questioned.
This video from Warrior Poet Society discusses whether civilians should own ballistic helmets. The description includes various links for Warrior Poet Society's website, training programs, merchandise, and app. It also promotes partners like My Patriot Supply and the Second Amendment Foundation, and provides social media links. The video appears to be an informational or discussion piece rather than a direct product review or demonstration, focusing on a safety and preparedness topic relevant to gun owners and preppers.
This video explores affordable firearm options by featuring a gun purchase around the $230 price point. It also delves into the world of civilian body armor, specifically highlighting "Under Armor Style" options. The content likely involves reviewing the firearm's capabilities and potentially comparing it to other budget options, while also assessing the protective qualities and practical application of the body armor.
This video, titled "Civilian Body Armor is Worthless," challenges the effectiveness of commonly available body armor for civilians. While the description doesn't provide specific details about the content of the video itself, it does include links to support the creator's Patreon, Venmo, and Instagram. The title strongly suggests a critical analysis or deconstruction of civilian body armor, likely involving discussions about its limitations against various threats or threats it's not designed to stop. The focus appears to be on the perceived inadequacy of civilian-grade ballistic protection.
This video features a "torture test" of RMA Lightweight Level 4 plates, presented as a potential top choice for civilian body armor. The review is conducted by Chadd from Three of Seven Project. The description encourages viewers to check out RMA Body Armor, support the Patreon page, and visit the project's store. While specific firearm models or calibers are not mentioned, the focus on body armor and its testing implies a connection to firearms and personal protection.
This video discusses HR 3247, a bill reintroduced in the U.S. House of Representatives that aims to ban rifle-rated body armor for civilian use. The creator argues that body armor is a defensive tool that should be accessible to everyone, particularly those who may not have other means of self-defense. The bill's reintroduction marks the third attempt to pass this legislation. The description also includes links to the bill's text, a body armor manufacturer (Premier Body Armor), and the creator's prepping and community resources.
This video, "Nuke Our Parks 7," by Trench Grenade, delves into topics surrounding firearm relevancy, civilian body armor, and ammunition selection. The description highlights a focus on revolvers and discusses practical considerations for armed citizens. The video also includes links to the creator's Instagram and Patreon pages.
This YouTube video discusses the controversial topic of civilian body armor ownership, framed within the broader context of gun control. The title directly poses the question, indicating a debate or examination of the legality and rationale behind allowing or restricting civilian access to body armor. The inclusion of '#guncontrol' suggests a focus on policy, rights, and the ongoing societal discussion surrounding firearms and related protective equipment.
This video explores the reasons why individuals might choose to own body armor. It delves into the practical applications and benefits of personal protective equipment, likely touching on self-defense and safety considerations. The content is presented by The GunGuy Uncensored and promotes related channels and resources, including Practical Defense Systems and various social media and podcast platforms.
Massad Ayoob highlights body armor as a critical safety tool for private citizens, particularly for home firearms handling. He proposes using body armor as a reliable 'safe direction' for loading, unloading, clearing jams, and dry firing, mitigating risks in environments where safe backstops are scarce. This approach emphasizes proactive safety measures to prevent accidental discharges.
This video provides an expert analysis of California's Assembly Bill 92, which proposes a ban on the purchase and possession of body armor by civilians. The discussion details current California laws, the specifics of AB 92, and its potential impact on self-defense rights, referencing Supreme Court rulings like Heller. It encourages viewers to contact their representatives to oppose the bill.
This video explores civilian body armor options, comparing steel, ceramic, and advanced Duritium plates. Steel plates are affordable but heavy and prone to spalling. Ceramic plates are lighter but fragile and require inspection. Shot Stop's Duritium plates offer the best combination of light weight, durability, and protection against specific threats without fragmentation. Soft armor is recommended behind hard plates to mitigate blunt force trauma.
Gun Laws by State
Read firearms regulations for all 50 states + D.C.
Find Gun Dealers
Search licensed FFL dealers near you.