Videos tagged with Class A Misdemeanor

This video from Armed Attorneys addresses several legal and self-defense questions relevant to firearm owners. Topics include the impact of Operation Chokepoint on credit card purchases of firearms, the validity of out-of-state CCW permits in Texas, the eligibility for constitutional carry after a deferred adjudication, whether bean bag rounds constitute deadly force, self-defense in national parks, and the legal implications of using a firearm without glasses during a home defense scenario. The discussion also touches on Texas charging practices for violent crimes and common self-defense scenarios.

This video discusses Tennessee bills HB 2064 and HB 2467, which aim to remove criminal penalties for law-abiding gun owners carrying firearms in public parks, playgrounds, and civic centers. The speaker argues that current laws create an impossible choice for gun owners, forcing them to either disarm in potentially unsafe areas or risk misdemeanor charges, especially after the passage of constitutional carry. The legislation seeks to eliminate the Class A misdemeanor associated with carrying in these locations, citing an average of 133 arrests annually for such offenses between 2020-2024.

This ARFCOM News episode covers critical Second Amendment and legal topics, including Illinois' proposed handgun ammunition serialization bill (HB 4414) and its associated penalties, the legislative effort to repeal the federal lead ammunition ban (HR 556), and rapper Afroman's successful lawsuit against deputies. The discussion highlights the financial and legal implications of these issues for gun owners and the broader implications for wildlife health.

This video, presented by William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, critically analyzes Illinois House Bill 4414, detailing its potential to disarm citizens through the mandatory serialization of handgun ammunition. Kirk explains the bill's broad definitions, impractical serialization requirements for projectiles, severe penalties including misdemeanor charges per round, and the creation of a centralized registry. He argues the legislation is designed to cripple the ammunition industry in Illinois, leading to scarcity and effectively banning ammunition for law-abiding citizens.

This video provides an expert overview of Oregon's new gun laws, specifically focusing on Senate Bill 243 and its impact on Ballot Measure 114. It details the ban on 'rapid fire devices' like binary triggers and bump stocks, outlines the penalties, and clarifies the implementation date for pre-purchase licensing. The content emphasizes the importance of lawful gun ownership and staying informed about legislative changes, as presented by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law.

William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law TV, provides an expert analysis of Oregon's Senate Bill 243, also known as the Community Safety Firearms Act. This law, effective September 26, 2025, broadly bans 'Rapid Fire Activators,' including devices like bump stocks and forced reset triggers, with severe penalties ranging from Class B Felonies for transfer to Class A Misdemeanors for possession. Additionally, the bill empowers local governments to establish gun-free zones in public buildings, overriding concealed carry permits. Kirk emphasizes the lack of grandfathering for existing devices and advises Oregon gun owners to understand the law's implications and potential legal dispossession options.

A New York state law banning the purchase and possession of body armor has been challenged in court. The plaintiffs argue the ban violates the Second Amendment, citing historical precedent and the defensive nature of body armor. A recent court order denied New York's motion to dismiss the case, allowing the lawsuit to proceed and signaling potential judicial agreement with the plaintiffs' arguments.

This video from Washington Gun Law, presented by President William Kirk, provides an expert breakdown of Oregon House Bill 2025, which bans unserialized and untraceable firearms. It clarifies the severe penalties associated with manufacturing or possessing such firearms, including Class B Felonies and Class A Misdemeanors, and offers guidance on compliance through FFL serialization, though noting limited FFL availability in Oregon.

Illinois is considering HB 3238, a bill that would ban the sale, manufacture, and transfer of body armor plates and ballistic helmets to average citizens. While a grandfather clause allows current owners to retain possession, it requires registration with the Illinois State Police and restricts use to private property. Violations carry misdemeanor and felony penalties, with exemptions for law enforcement and military personnel.

This analysis dissects New York's Assembly Bill 4271, a proposed law that aims to ban the sale of 'child operated firearms' by FFLs. The bill defines such firearms as pistols or revolvers manufactured 12+ months after the law's effective date that lack specific child-proofing mechanisms, such as a 10-pound trigger pull or designs preventing operation by a five-year-old. The expert critique highlights the law's flawed premise, questioning the focus on child misuse and the impracticality of proposed safety features for self-defense. The video also contextualizes this bill within New York's broader trend of restrictive gun legislation.

This video from Armed Scholar breaks down the legal challenges to Oregon's Measure 114, focusing on the "Arnold v. Brown" case. It explains the requirements for the firearm purchase permit and the ban on magazines over 10 rounds. The discussion highlights the temporary injunctions granted by Judge Robert Raschio, which have blocked the measure's implementation, and anticipates a ruling on background check requirements in early January. The content is presented with an instructional tone by an experienced speaker.

This video provides an expert analysis of the legal challenges facing Oregon's Measure 114, which mandates a permit to purchase firearms and bans large-capacity magazines. The speaker, an expert in firearms law, details the permit requirements, the scope of the magazine ban, and the logistical hurdles and legal arguments presented in court. The analysis highlights the potential impact on firearm sales and the ongoing legal battles seeking to block the measure's implementation.