Videos tagged with Federal Prohibition

This video from Washington Gun Law TV breaks down a significant ruling from the District of Kansas that declared the federal prohibition on automatic weapons (18 U.S. Code Section 922(o)) unconstitutional. While a moral victory, the ruling is unlikely to have immediate practical effects due to expected government appeals to the 10th Circuit. The analysis highlights government legal strategy oversights and predicts the case's likely trajectory.

This video discusses the proposed "Modern Firearms Safety Act," a federal bill aiming to ban state-level handgun rosters. It explains how these rosters, exemplified by California's system, restrict firearm sales by requiring specific safety features like loaded chamber indicators or microstamping. The bill's sponsors, Representatives Elise Stefanik and Daryl Issa, argue these rosters are unconstitutional and hinder lawful gun ownership. The likelihood of the bill passing is tied to the upcoming election outcomes.

The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) has announced its intention to defend former President Donald Trump's Second Amendment rights following his felony conviction. SAF's stance, articulated by Alan Gottlieb and Adam Kraut, is that individuals should not lose their gun rights due to non-violent convictions, citing the Supreme Court's Bruen decision. They are prepared to litigate against New York State or the federal government if Trump faces further prosecution related to firearm ownership.

This video discusses the legal challenges brought by the Firearms Policy Coalition and the Second Amendment Foundation against Pennsylvania's restrictions on handgun purchases for 18-20 year olds. It highlights a significant win at the Third Circuit Court, which affirmed that this age group is covered by Second Amendment rights, comparing it to other constitutional rights like voting. The speaker criticizes the inconsistency of allowing 18-20 year olds to serve in the military but not own handguns for self-defense.

This video discusses President Joe Biden's December 22, 2023, proclamation pardoning thousands of individuals convicted of simple marijuana possession, attempted simple possession, or use of marijuana federally and in Washington D.C. The speaker emphasizes the potential impact on Second Amendment rights, as federal marijuana prohibition can lead to a loss of firearm ownership. The proclamation specifically excludes offenses like intent to distribute or DUI.

The ATF has issued a notice to Arkansas regarding its Concealed Handgun Carry License (CHCL) program. The ATF is concerned that Arkansas law, specifically House Bill 1784, allows individuals who use medical marijuana to obtain a CHCL, which can then be used to bypass the federal NICS background check when acquiring firearms. This is problematic because federal law prohibits unlawful users of controlled substances, including marijuana, from possessing firearms. The ATF is requesting clarification from Arkansas on how it ensures CHCL holders are not federally prohibited persons and warns that failure to address these concerns could result in the CHCL no longer qualifying as an alternative to the NICS check.

This video discusses the Fraser v. ATF court case, which challenged the federal prohibition on 18-to-21-year-olds acquiring handguns through licensed dealers. Judge Robert Payne ruled that the Second Amendment protects this age group's right to acquire handguns, rejecting arguments based on historical interpretations of 'the people' and the age of majority. However, the ruling also noted a distinction between the right to acquire and the right to sell firearms, which the speaker finds potentially problematic for future legal arguments.

A federal judge has declared the federal prohibition on firearm possession by marijuana users unconstitutional, citing the Second Amendment. The ruling in US v. Jared Michael Harrison found that the law, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3), lacks historical precedent and overreaches by prohibiting possession based on status rather than active intoxication. This decision challenges the interpretation of 'law-abiding citizen' in relation to firearm rights.

This entry details significant legal victories for Second Amendment rights following the Supreme Court's Bruen decision. It highlights how various state and local firearm restrictions have been overturned by adhering to the 'text, history, and tradition' test established in Bruen. The information is presented by Guns & Gadgets, a channel focused on Second Amendment news, indicating an expert-level discussion of legal precedents and their impact.

This video discusses Florida Agriculture Commissioner Nikki Fried's lawsuit against the Biden administration, challenging the federal prohibition of marijuana users from owning firearms. The speaker argues that while Fried is doing the right thing by addressing this constitutional issue, her motivations may be political due to her gubernatorial run. The video highlights the discrepancy where prescribed medications like Fentanyl do not affect gun rights, while marijuana use, even if legal at the state level, can lead to federal prohibition. It also touches on the upcoming Florida gubernatorial election between Fried and Ron DeSantis, questioning voter choices based on their stances on Second Amendment issues.

This video discusses a potential political strategy by anti-gun groups to implement a 'No-Fly, No-Buy' policy. The argument suggests that individuals placed on a 'no-fly' list, potentially for reasons unrelated to actual flight safety, could then be federally prohibited from purchasing firearms. This strategy is framed as a '4D chess move' to disarm Americans by leveraging existing or proposed watchlists and linking them to other mandates, such as vaccine status.

This video from Guns & Gadgets provides an expert analysis of HR882, the 'Keeping Guns From High-Risk Individuals Act.' The speaker, demonstrating deep knowledge of firearms law and legislative processes, explains how this bill could significantly expand the definition of a federally prohibited person. He details new criteria related to 'crimes of violence,' juvenile records, controlled substance offenses, and stalking, warning that millions could become prohibited. The analysis highlights the interaction between state and federal laws, particularly concerning misdemeanor offenses.