Videos tagged with Firearm Policy Coalition

This YouTube video discusses "Red Flag Laws" and "Gun Free Zones," framed as a "New Face of Gun Control." The description prominently features affiliate links for firearm-related companies like EOTech, Vortex, and Viktos, along with donation links for various gun rights organizations including SAF, Gun Owners of America, Firearm Policy Coalition, and CCRKBA. The presence of these sponsors and advocacy groups suggests a focus on the political and legal aspects of firearm ownership and regulation.

This video discusses the NRA's recent legal action challenging the National Firearms Act (NFA). The NRA is building a coalition and filing lawsuits, aiming to overturn what they describe as "extreme tyranny" related to firearms regulations. The content focuses on the legal and political fight for Second Amendment rights, with specific reference to lawsuits filed by the NRA and the Firearm Policy Coalition challenging the NFA.

This video from the VSO Gun Channel discusses a legal victory by the Firearm Policy Coalition (FPC) against New Jersey's concealed carry restrictions. The district court ruled the state's laws unconstitutional, which the FPC views as a significant win. The description emphasizes VSO's role as an educational resource promoting responsible gun ownership and safety, clarifying their business model does not involve selling firearms.

This video details the legal battle surrounding assault weapon bans, specifically focusing on the Bianchi v. Frosh case originating in Maryland. It explains how the case has reached the Supreme Court, potentially impacting rifle bans nationwide. The discussion highlights the shift in legal review standards post-Bruen, emphasizing 'text as informed by relevant history and tradition' over previous scrutiny tests.

This video provides a crucial correction to previous information regarding the "Texas v. ATF" pistol brace rule case. William Kirk of Washington Gun Law clarifies the extent of the injunctive relief granted, aiming to resolve confusion and educate viewers on its implications for their Second Amendment rights. The description includes links to the court order, firearm advocacy organizations (FPC, SAF, GOA), Washington Gun Law's contact information, the relevant ATF rule, and previous related YouTube videos. It encourages viewers to stay informed and emphasizes the importance of education regarding firearm laws.

This video discusses a recent court ruling where the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals granted an injunction against the ATF's final rule concerning pistol braces. The content highlights both positive and negative aspects of this development in the context of the Mock v. Garland case, referencing the Firearm Policy Coalition (FPC). It also includes promotional material for SDI and a gold dealer, along with social media and merchandise links for the channel. A disclaimer clarifies that the content is not legal advice and is for educational/entertainment purposes only, with a strong warning against attempting any demonstrated actions at home.

This news update from Guns & Gadgets discusses a significant legal victory in Massachusetts where a district court's ruling on the handgun roster was vacated. The case, Granada v Campbell, challenged the state's restrictive handgun roster requirements. The First Circuit's decision sends the case back to the district court, requiring a new ruling consistent with the Supreme Court's Bruen decision, which emphasizes historical tradition in Second Amendment jurisprudence.

This video, presented by licensed attorney Anthony Miranda of the Firearm Policy Coalition, details the ATF's proposed rule to ban pistol braces by classifying them as Short-Barreled Rifles (SBRs). It covers the rule's 'point system' for classification, the significant public opposition, and the recent delay in its finalization due to a lawsuit filed by the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF), with the ATF now indicating a January 2023 publication date.

This video discusses the Rhode v. Bonta case challenging California's handgun roster. The speaker, an experienced firearms instructor, explains how the roster's stringent requirements, like micro-stamping, effectively ban new handguns and violate Second Amendment rights as interpreted by the Bruen decision. A preliminary injunction hearing is scheduled for February 10th, 2023, with a potential win seen as a significant victory for gun rights.

This video uses humor to discuss the current state of firearm laws in the United States, highlighting how proposed legislation could lead to millions of Americans becoming felons. It emphasizes the seriousness of the issue as an "overreach of our rights and freedoms." The description encourages viewers to get involved and provides a link to the Firearm Policy Coalition (FPC). The video also includes affiliate links for firearm parts and carry insurance.

An authoritative legal analysis from Armed Scholar details a federal court's limited injunction against the ATF's new rule classifying frames and receivers, including 80% kits, as firearms. The ruling questions the ATF's authority to expand definitions beyond congressional intent, with plaintiffs seeking a nationwide injunction to protect manufacturers and consumers.

This video discusses a legal victory in California regarding firearm purchase waiting periods, specifically challenging the CA DOJ's alleged practice of delaying background checks beyond the legal 10-day period. The lawsuit, Campos v. Bonta, resulted in a win, preventing the state from further delays due to administrative inefficiencies. The description also includes various affiliate links for supplements, merchandise, health services, body armor, and coffee.