Videos tagged with Great Bodily Harm

This video, featuring Kevin Michalowski of the USCCA and attorney Tom Grieve, delves into the complex legalities of using deadly force in the United States for self-defense. It specifically addresses viewer questions about whether the threshold for using deadly force changes during civil unrest or natural disasters, particularly when protecting essential supplies like food and water. The experts clarify that the core legal standard – reasonably fearing imminent death or great bodily harm – remains constant, although circumstances can influence a jury's perception of a threat. They strongly advise against engaging in riots and emphasize the importance of safe escape if possible, reiterating that self-defense laws do not adapt to societal upheaval.

This video, featuring Kevin Michalowski from the U.S. Concealed Carry Association and criminal defense attorney Tom Grieve, addresses the critical question of when it is legally permissible to use deadly force in self-defense. The discussion centers on the concept of "stand your ground" and outlines that deadly force is only justifiable when facing an imminent threat of death or great bodily harm. The experts emphasize that any use of force must be objectively reasonable, considering factors like disparity in size, strength, and the availability of escape options. Deadly force is presented as an absolute last resort, never justified for lesser threats to oneself or property. The video also promotes the USCCA through links for a gun giveaway and membership.

This video features the U.S. Concealed Carry Association's Director of Content, Kevin Michalowski, and criminal defense attorney Tom Grieve analyzing a gas station security footage incident where an employee shoots at a fleeing shoplifter. They discuss the legal ramifications, ethical considerations, and potential dangers of using deadly force in such a situation. The analysis emphasizes that deadly force is only justified to prevent death or great bodily harm, and the employee's actions were not legally justifiable, potentially leading to severe legal consequences. The video advises gun owners to remain calm and use proper judgment, highlighting the lack of firearms training observed in the incident.

This video discusses the legal justifications for using deadly force in self-defense when attacked with an airsoft pistol. Criminal defense attorney Tom Grieve and USCCA Director of Content Kevin Michalowski explore scenarios where an airsoft gun might reasonably be perceived as a deadly threat, the legal definitions of deadly force and great bodily harm, and the importance of knowing local laws. The video emphasizes that the legality of returning fire is highly dependent on the specific circumstances and jurisdiction.

This video, featuring criminal defense attorney Tom Grieve and USCCA's Kevin Michalowski, explores the complex legalities of using deadly force against an unarmed attacker. It emphasizes that a deadly threat can exist without a weapon if the attacker's actions foreseeably lead to death or great bodily harm. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding local self-defense laws and factors like size disparity in assessing reasonable fear, while strongly advocating for avoidance and de-escalation as primary strategies.

This video from Active Self Protection analyzes a violent road rage incident in South Africa. Host John Correia, an evidence-based defensive trainer, breaks down the assault, emphasizing the importance of emotional control and de-escalation techniques like 'Verbal Judo' and maintaining a 'defensive fence'. The analysis highlights the critical nature of the 'reactionary gap' and suggests non-lethal tools like OC spray for bystander intervention. It also touches upon the legal thresholds for using lethal force when facing Great Bodily Harm.

This video, "Into the Fray Episode 288," analyzes a Walmart self-defense shooting incident. It discusses the legalities of using deadly force, focusing on when the threat ceases and an individual should stop shooting. The video highlights a case where a woman, initially a victim, faced felony charges due to actions after the initial threat subsided. It emphasizes the legal requirement to reasonably articulate an imminent fear of death or great bodily harm and the importance of knowing when to cease shooting in self-defense. The USCCA's mission to educate and protect gun owners is also promoted.

This video from the USCCA explores the complex scenario of intervening to help someone being threatened. It clarifies that while self-defense training is valuable, there's no legal obligation for concealed carriers to step into risky situations to protect others. The video emphasizes the importance of understanding the potential consequences before acting and encourages viewers to learn more about self-defense training and legal protections offered by the USCCA.