Videos tagged with Gun Manufacturer Liability

This video discusses recent and proposed gun legislation in Illinois, arguing that the laws are politically motivated rather than safety-focused. It details the Protect Illinois Citizens Act (PICA) and its low compliance rate, as well as Senate Bill SB 2279 and the RIFL Act (House Bill 3320), which aim to license manufacturers and hold them financially responsible for gun violence. The speaker, an Illinoisan and firearms instructor, advises residents to obtain FOID cards and concealed carry permits while they still can.

A federal appeals court has ruled that New York's 'Public Nuisance Liability for Gun Industry Act' does not conflict with the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA). This decision allows lawsuits against gun manufacturers for creating a public nuisance, even if they followed all existing laws, potentially opening the door for widespread litigation against the firearms industry. The ruling sets a precedent that other states may follow, impacting the legal shield protecting gun makers.

This video discusses recent gun safety legislation signed by Governor Newsom in California. Key points include a bill allowing lawsuits against irresponsible gun manufacturers and distributors, a law doubling taxes on gun and ammunition sales, and proposed measures like raising the minimum firearm purchase age to 21, mandating universal background checks, instituting waiting periods, and banning civilian ownership of assault rifles.

This video covers the Supreme Court hearing of Mexico v. Smith & Wesson Brands Inc., a landmark case where Mexico is suing several U.S. firearms manufacturers, alleging they are responsible for cartel violence. The core legal arguments revolve around the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) and whether the manufacturers' actions constitute aiding and abetting illegal firearms trafficking or proximate cause for the harm in Mexico. The arguments presented highlight the complexities of international liability and the interpretation of existing U.S. laws.

Following a second assassination attempt on Donald Trump, renewed calls for national gun control measures are emerging. These include a potential ban on semi-automatic rifles, often termed 'assault weapons,' through legislation like the Go SAFE Act. Additionally, there's a push for expanded red flag laws and a nationwide ban on body armor, with proponents arguing it's not protected by the Second Amendment. The discussion also touches upon attempts to pierce the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) to hold gun manufacturers liable for criminal acts.

The Supreme Court declined to review KCI v. E Judicial District Court of Nevada, a case concerning whether firearm magazines are 'component parts' protected under the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA). This decision allows lower courts to continue interpreting PLCAA's scope, potentially impacting liability for accessory manufacturers and leading to increased litigation against firearm and accessory companies.

This video discusses potential legislative responses to an assassination attempt on Donald Trump, focusing on three main areas: bans on semi-automatic rifles like the AR-15, restrictions on ammunition sales and background checks, and increased liability for gun manufacturers regarding their marketing practices. The speaker, identified as Armed Scholar, analyzes these proposed measures, suggesting they are likely to be reintroduced or newly proposed at a national level.

Colion Noir, an expert firearms instructor, debunks Jon Stewart's claims on The Daily Show regarding gun control and violence. He analyzes crime statistics, gun sales data, and the effectiveness of gun control laws, arguing that failed political policies in liberal-run cities are the primary drivers of gun violence, not the availability of firearms. Noir also discusses legal protections for gun manufacturers and the complexities of regulations surrounding items like bump stocks and terror watchlists.

This video discusses the lawsuit filed by Mexico against American gun manufacturers, including Smith & Wesson, Glock, and Ruger. It highlights the legal arguments, the role of the Brady Campaign as a foreign agent, and the potential impact on the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA). The speaker expresses strong disapproval of the lawsuit's premise and its revival by the First Circuit Court of Appeals.

An appeals court has revived Mexico's lawsuit against several U.S. firearm manufacturers, ruling that the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) does not bar claims alleging a specific type of statutory exemption. This decision allows Mexico to pursue claims that manufacturers are willfully and maliciously exporting firearms into the country, contributing to gun violence. The ruling is seen as a significant challenge to PLCAA protections.

This video analyzes the newly established White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention, critically examining its stated goals and potential impact on Second Amendment rights. The speaker argues that the office's nomenclature has shifted over time from 'gun control' to 'gun safety' and now 'gun violence prevention,' while the underlying objective remains prohibition. Key concerns include proposed bans on 'assault weapons' and standard-capacity magazines, mandatory safe storage, universal background checks, and the elimination of gun manufacturer liability protections under the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA).

This video discusses a new legislative proposal in Washington State aimed at banning the sale of "military-style assault weapons" and holding firearm manufacturers and dealers liable for preventing their products from falling into the wrong hands. The speaker expresses concern over these measures, framing them as an attack on the Second Amendment and the firearms industry, and highlights the subjective nature of the proposed legislation.