Videos tagged with Illinois Supreme Court

The Illinois Supreme Court upheld the state's ban on 'assault weapons' and large-capacity magazines, ruling it did not violate state constitutional clauses on equal protection or special legislation. The decision focused on state constitutional grounds, sidestepping Second Amendment arguments due to procedural waivers by the plaintiffs. This ruling has implications for similar bans in other states and may lead to further legal challenges in federal courts, potentially reaching the U.S. Supreme Court.

This video from Washington Gun Law, presented by William Kirk, analyzes the Illinois Supreme Court's decision in Davis v. Yenchko. It explains how the court used the legal concepts of standing and mootness to dismiss a challenge to the state's FOID Card Act, even though the plaintiffs had their cards revoked due to felony charges. The analysis highlights how legal technicalities can prevent constitutional challenges to gun laws from being heard on their merits.

This video discusses the constitutionality of taxes on guns and ammunition, with a focus on an oral argument before the Illinois Supreme Court. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith from Four Boxes Diner analyzes the legal fight and its implications for Second Amendment rights. The discussion touches on historical court precedent, the distinction between taxes and fees, and potential outcomes. The content aims to inform gun owners about legislative and legal challenges to their rights.

This video analyzes comments made by Senator Chris Murphy regarding gun control legislation in Illinois and its legal challenges. The speaker criticizes Murphy's interpretation of the Supreme Court's role, arguing that he advocates for popular opinion to dictate constitutional law rather than upholding the established checks and balances. The discussion highlights the perceived hypocrisy in Murphy's praise for certain court rulings while condemning others, framing it as political maneuvering.

The Illinois Supreme Court ruled in Hart v. Illinois State Police that individuals denied Concealed Carry Permits or FOID cards cannot access their own application data through the state's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). While the court acknowledged that applicants might be able to obtain this information through the Firearm Services Bureau, it determined that FOIA is not the proper avenue for such requests, even when the applicant consents to the disclosure of their own information.

This video discusses the Illinois Supreme Court's upholding of the Protect Illinois Communities Act, which bans certain assault weapons and requires registration. It highlights the extremely low compliance rate with the registration mandate, suggesting widespread disregard for the law. The video also touches upon the potential for confiscation for non-compliance and raises concerns about the act's constitutionality and the process by which it was enacted, including allegations of judicial corruption.

This video critiques a firearms liability insurance salesman for lacking knowledge of specific state firearms regulations, particularly in the Illinois and Maryland (DMV area) markets. The instructor emphasizes the importance of understanding local laws, such as magazine capacity limits and assault weapons bans, for effective sales and partnerships within the firearms community.

This video delves into political and legal discussions surrounding firearm regulations in Illinois and California. It touches upon a potential bribery accusation against the Illinois Governor related to the Supreme Court's decision on gun laws. The description references a constitutional amendment proposed by the California Governor and a new Illinois law allowing victims to sue gun manufacturers. Additionally, it highlights an upcoming election featuring 'AK Daddy' and promotes other related YouTube content.

The Illinois Supreme Court upheld the state's assault weapon ban (PICA) in a 4-3 decision, reversing a lower court's ruling. The court found that the plaintiffs did not properly challenge the ban on Second Amendment grounds, instead focusing on equal protection claims. Separately, a First Amendment amicus brief filed by the channel's host and others was successful, leading the government to withdraw a motion for a gag order in the CRS Firearms case.

This video discusses the Illinois Supreme Court's decision to uphold the state's "assault weapon" ban. The court ruled that the ban does not violate the Illinois state constitution. The analysis touches on the upcoming state justice election and includes a dissent from Justice O'Brian. The content also criticizes what it calls "gun violence" propaganda and emphasizes the importance of understanding the "four boxes" of American liberty: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the ammunition box, for defending individual freedoms.

The Illinois Supreme Court has upheld the state's ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, ruling it constitutional under the state constitution. This decision contrasts with a previous ruling by a Macon County judge who found the ban unconstitutional due to equal protection violations. The case is expected to proceed to federal court, potentially reaching the U.S. Supreme Court for a final determination on national implications.

This video discusses the Illinois Safe-T Act, which eliminates cash bail, and its implications for public safety. The speaker argues that this law, effective September 18, 2023, will lead to criminals being released onto the streets, potentially increasing crime. It highlights concerns from law enforcement officials about the act's impact on victims and the perceived lack of incentive for police to make arrests.