This video from Hegshot87 discusses how the ATF may deny NFA applications, specifically Form 1, based on the stated 'reason for making' the firearm. The speaker, exhibiting high authority on NFA compliance, advises using 'any lawful purpose' to avoid administrative denials or delays, contrasting this with the idea of rights being treated as mere permission slips.
This video discusses the legal ruling in Fouts v. BONTA (pc22210) where Judge Benitez struck down the ban on "Billy clubs." The description highlights this as an example of a protected arm for lawful purposes. It also includes a mailing address for Reno May.
This video from Washington Gun Law, presented by William Kirk, an expert in firearms law, breaks down the significant 'Mock v. Garland' ruling concerning pistol braces. The ruling establishes that braced pistols are in 'common use' by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes, making bans on them unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. Kirk highlights this as a major legal victory, emphasizing the ATF's repeated legal setbacks.
The Supreme Court has ruled in Duncan v. Bonta, declaring California's ban on removable firearm magazines unconstitutional. This decision recognizes standard-capacity magazines as necessary components of semi-automatic firearms protected by the Second Amendment. While the ruling is effective immediately, a ten-day stay is in place to allow for potential appeals.
This video analyzes the legal implications of the Bruen Supreme Court decision on 'assault weapon' and magazine bans. It argues that the core legal test for constitutionality relies on whether these arms are commonly possessed for lawful purposes by Americans. If they are, bans are unconstitutional, and a separate historical analysis is not required as common possession inherently implies historical use. The video discusses the Second Amendment's clauses and distinguishes between criminal misuse and lawful use of firearms. It emphasizes the importance of this legal understanding for Second Amendment supporters.
This video, presented by an attorney specializing in Second Amendment law, breaks down the legal arguments and implications of the Miller v. Bonta case concerning California's assault weapon ban. It details the plaintiffs' arguments, the 'hardware test' used by courts to determine constitutionality, and the statistical evidence supporting the common ownership of AR-15s for lawful purposes. The discussion highlights how this case could impact assault weapon bans nationwide, particularly in states like Maryland.
You've reached the end! 6 videos loaded.
Gun Laws by State
Read firearms regulations for all 50 states + D.C.
Find Gun Dealers
Search licensed FFL dealers near you.