Videos tagged with Private Property Carry

This video provides a comprehensive overview of the evolving concealed carry landscape in the US as of 2026. It highlights the split between permitless and permit-required states, the impact of federal legislation like HR 38, and the critical role of court decisions in defining 'sensitive places' and carry restrictions. The speaker emphasizes the need for diligent research into state-specific statutes and local ordinances to ensure legal carry.

This video discusses the Supreme Court case Walford v. Lopez, which addresses the legality of carrying firearms on private property open to the public. Gun Owners of America (GOA) played a role in creating the circuit split that led to this case, stemming from their Antonyuk v. James case in New York. The core issue is whether states can implement 'vampire clauses' that require explicit permission from private property owners for concealed carry, effectively banning it by default in many locations.

This video discusses two major Second Amendment legal developments: a lawsuit filed by the NRA against California's new 'Glock ban' bill (AB 1127) and the Supreme Court's decision to hear the Wolfford v. Lopez case concerning public carry on private property. It highlights the legal challenges and implications of these cases for gun owners in California and nationwide.

Joel Persinger of GunGuyTV provides a concise update on the Second Amendment landscape, focusing on the Wolford v. Lopez case. This case challenges Hawaii's law, which bans firearm carry on private property open to the public unless express permission is granted, a rule often termed the 'vampire rule.' The video explains how this law inverts historical carry norms and its potential impact on similar laws in states like California.

A federal judge has struck down New York's 'vampire rule,' which prohibited concealed carry on private property unless explicitly permitted by a sign. This ruling, stemming from the Bruen decision, found the law unconstitutional as it effectively banned carry by default. The judge denied the state's request for a stay, making the injunction immediately effective for private property open to the public. Decisions on public park restrictions are pending.

This video provides a breakdown of a significant ruling by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals concerning New York's Concealed Carry Improvement Act. While the court affirmed injunctions against certain provisions, including the disclosure of social media accounts and restrictions on carrying on private property accessible to the public and in places of worship, it upheld the 'good moral character' clause for permit applicants. The ruling represents a partial victory for gun rights advocates but indicates the legal battle is ongoing.

This video discusses Hawaii's House Bill 984, which proposes significant expansions to gun-free zones and introduces requirements like personal liability insurance for firearm carriers. A key point is the bill's potential to criminalize on-duty and off-duty law enforcement officers carrying firearms, as highlighted in testimony from the Chief of Police of Kauai. The speaker argues this creates a 'for them, not for us' scenario, undermining trust in law enforcement's commitment to constitutional rights.

This video, featuring attorney Tom Grieve, provides an expert analysis of New York's post-Bruen gun laws. It details how New York is interpreting and implementing the Supreme Court's ruling, often in ways that create new restrictions on concealed carry, particularly concerning 'sensitive locations' and private property. The discussion highlights the legal challenges and the ongoing efforts to navigate these complex regulations.

This video provides an expert analysis from a constitutional attorney on a significant federal court ruling that declared a major portion of New York's 'Sensitive Places' law unconstitutional. The ruling, which immediately goes into effect, impacts carry restrictions on private property and is based on established Second Amendment legal precedents like Heller, McDonald, and Bruen. The host highlights the importance of historical legal analysis in challenging modern firearm regulations.