Videos tagged with Takings Clause

This video discusses a proposed bill in Rhode Island (H8073) that aims to ban the possession of firearms already legally owned by residents. The bill, modeled after Canadian gun control measures, seeks to expand the state's existing assault weapons ban by prohibiting possession, not just future sales. The speaker argues this constitutes confiscation and violates Second Amendment rights, citing concerns about the Fifth Amendment's takings clause and the Supreme Court's Bruin decision, which requires historical tradition for gun regulations. The video highlights overwhelming public opposition during a committee hearing, though the bill remains alive for further study.

This video discusses the filing of a reply brief in the Duncan v. Bonta case, which challenges California's ban on standard capacity magazines. Legal expert Chuck Michelle explains the arguments for the Supreme Court to take the case, focusing on potential circuit splits regarding what constitutes a 'common use' firearm and the implications of the takings clause for lawfully acquired property. The discussion highlights the importance of the case for Second Amendment rights and the ongoing legal battle.

This video discusses the legal challenges to California's ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds, specifically focusing on the Duncan v. Bont case before the Supreme Court. It analyzes the state's opposition brief, highlighting arguments regarding the Second Amendment and the Takings Clause. The discussion also touches upon the US v. Peterson case, where the DOJ conceded a magazine ban was unconstitutional, and the implications for Second Amendment jurisprudence.

This video analyzes the legal arguments presented in Duncan v. Bont, a significant case concerning magazine bans pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. It details California's response brief, focusing on their attempts to argue against Second Amendment protections for high-capacity magazines and their interpretation of legal precedents like Bruen and Heller. The discussion also touches upon the Fifth Amendment's takings clause in relation to confiscation.

This video discusses the legal case Duncan v. Bonta, challenging California's ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds. It details the case's journey through the courts, including opposition briefs filed by California arguing against Supreme Court review. The speaker highlights the potential national impact if the Supreme Court takes the case and rules against magazine bans.

This video analyzes the critical Supreme Court case Duncan v. Bonta, which challenges California's ban on standard-capacity magazines (over 10 rounds). It details the case's history, its connection to Proposition 63, and the potential implications of a Supreme Court denial, which would solidify the ban and impact gun owners nationwide. The analysis highlights the legal arguments, including the Second and Fifth Amendments, and the broader fight for Second Amendment rights across the country.

This video analyzes an amicus brief filed in Duncan v. Bonta, challenging California's magazine ban. The brief argues that the ban infringes upon Second Amendment rights and potentially violates the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause. It highlights the need for the Supreme Court to provide clearer guidance to lower courts regarding Second Amendment interpretations, particularly concerning arms in common use for self-defense.

This video discusses the ongoing legal challenge to California's ban on standard-capacity magazines in the case of Duncan v. Bont. It highlights the petitioners' renewed appeal to the Supreme Court, emphasizing the Ninth Circuit's repeated rulings that allegedly disregard Supreme Court precedent like Bruen and Heller. The discussion also touches upon the potential Fifth Amendment takings clause violations inherent in confiscating lawfully acquired property without compensation.

The NRA has filed a writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court regarding California's magazine ban, seeking to challenge it as a violation of the Second and Fifth Amendments. This legal action, supported by the California Rifle and Pistol Association, centers on the 'common use' argument established in Heller and Bruin, asserting that magazines are common arms protected by the Second Amendment. The case, Duncan v. Bont, has been in litigation for nearly a decade and could set a precedent for other state-level gun control measures.

This video details the 10-year legal battle against California's ban on standard capacity magazines, culminating in a petition to the Supreme Court (SCOTUS). CRPA President Chuck Michel, an expert in constitutional litigation, explains the case's significance in clarifying the application of the Bruen decision and its potential impact on Second Amendment challenges nationwide. The discussion covers the case's history, critiques the Ninth Circuit's ruling, and outlines the potential outcomes if SCOTUS accepts the case.

This video discusses a significant Second Amendment case heard by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals concerning the confiscation of firearms. The case, Novak v. Michigan Sheriff's Office, questions whether law enforcement can permanently seize firearms from a property owner due to a crime committed by a tenant on their property. The court's review focuses on violations of the Takings Clause and Second Amendment rights, with a potential ruling that could impact future firearm confiscation cases.

Jeremiah Cottle, inventor of the bump stock, discusses the legal and personal battles surrounding its ban and subsequent Supreme Court ruling. He details the timeline of Slidefire Solutions, the ATF's initial approval, the ban following the Las Vegas shooting, the destruction of his property, and his ongoing lawsuit seeking compensation. The conversation highlights the complexities of firearm regulation, the impact on manufacturers, and the importance of legal challenges in protecting Second Amendment rights.