William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, provides an expert legal analysis on when it is permissible to use lethal force against an unarmed attacker. He emphasizes that legality hinges on the objective and subjective reasonableness of the threat, focusing on the principles of necessity, reasonableness, and proportionality. The discussion highlights 'disparity of force' and non-traditional threats as key factors in justifying lethal force, distinguishing legal rights from tactical decisions.
This YouTube Short features a criminal defense attorney and former state prosecutor, Tom Grieve, addressing the legal implications of using deadly force against an unarmed home attacker. The video aims to answer whether it is legally permissible to shoot someone who is attempting to break into a home but is not visibly armed, focusing on the concept of home self-defense and the relevant legal boundaries.
This video, featuring USCCA's Kevin Michalowski and attorney Tom Grieve, discusses the complex legalities of using deadly force against an unarmed attacker. It emphasizes that an unarmed individual can pose a deadly threat if their actions foreseeably could lead to death or great bodily harm, with specific considerations for factors like size disparity. The importance of understanding state-specific laws and de-escalation is highlighted.
You've reached the end! 3 videos loaded.
Gun Laws by State
Read firearms regulations for all 50 states + D.C.
Find Gun Dealers
Search licensed FFL dealers near you.