Videos tagged with US Attorney

This video from Liberty Doll discusses the opaque process of rights restoration for individuals seeking to regain federal firearms privileges after a felony conviction. The Department of Justice (DOJ) has made it difficult to ascertain the criteria, even denying Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. Expert analysis highlights the lack of transparency and potential for this initiative to be a public relations effort rather than a substantive process.

This video from Guns & Gadgets discusses a significant victory for Second Amendment rights as the DOJ, under the guidance of US Attorney Janine Pirro's office in DC, has decided not to prosecute individuals solely for possessing 'high-capacity' magazines. This policy shift, influenced by the Supreme Court's Bruen decision and the Benson case, challenges DC's 17-year ban on magazines exceeding 10 rounds, aiming to vacate convictions and provide clarity for gun owners. The speaker, an experienced Second Amendment advocate, highlights the positive implications for constitutional rights and limiting prosecutorial discretion, while acknowledging the law remains on the books pending a definitive court ruling.

This video analyzes the significant changes in Washington D.C.'s concealed carry permit process, driven by federal intervention under the Home Rule Act. It highlights the shift from a restrictive 'may issue' system to a faster 'shall issue' process, drastically reducing permit wait times from months to under a week. The analysis connects these changes to a decrease in violent crime and carjackings, suggesting a potential model for other restrictive cities.

This analysis details a recent motion filed by a US Attorney concerning suppressors and the Second Amendment. The motion, filed in the Peterson case before the Fifth Circuit, acknowledges that suppressors are firearm accessories protected by the Second Amendment but argues that NFA registration and taxation remain constitutional due to historical tradition and adaptability to criminal misuse. The speaker interprets this as a 'deep state' maneuver to complicate suppressor deregulation efforts.

This video critiques the Trump administration's stance on automatic weapons, specifically their support for the NFA and opposition to a federal judge's ruling that declared the NFA unconstitutional. The speaker argues that this position contradicts Trump's pro-2A rhetoric and suggests a lack of genuine commitment to Second Amendment rights.

This video discusses a perceived 'revolt' within the DOJ against Second Amendment rights, specifically focusing on a lawsuit involving 80% gun kits. The speaker argues that certain US Attorneys are acting independently of stated DOJ and Trump administration goals, retroactively applying rulings like the Vanderstock decision to prosecute individuals and companies for selling 80% kits that had prior ATF approval. This is presented as a pattern of 'rogue elements' within the DOJ undermining pro-2A initiatives.

This video discusses the potential for the Trump Department of Justice to reopen the investigation into the death of Ashli Babbitt. Host Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney, argues that 18 USC 1111 (federal murder statute) may apply due to the incident occurring on federal property, and that 18 USC 3281 may negate a statute of limitations for capital offenses. He highlights reporting on the involved officer's disciplinary record and contrasts the Biden DOJ's swift closure with other, longer investigations.

This video analyzes the ATF's legal strategy regarding Forced Reset Triggers (FRTs), bump stocks, and ghost guns, arguing their case is weak due to a misinterpretation of the National Firearms Act (NFA). The speaker contends the ATF is focusing on rate of fire rather than the statutory definition of a machine gun, which requires a single pull of the trigger to fire multiple rounds. If the ATF loses on FRTs, the speaker believes their broader regulatory actions against other firearm components will also be jeopardized.

This video discusses a case where an Ohio man, Gianni Dews, was sentenced to federal prison for possessing a Glock switch on his firearm, despite using it in self-defense. The presenter emphasizes that while self-defense is a right, modifying a firearm to be fully automatic renders it illegal to possess, regardless of the circumstances of its use. The case highlights the severe legal consequences of such modifications.

Federal agents have reportedly gathered sufficient evidence to charge Hunter Biden with tax crimes and making a false statement on a firearm purchase form (4473). The false statement allegedly relates to his denial of illicit narcotic use, despite evidence to the contrary. The decision to prosecute now rests with U.S. Attorney David Weiss, a Trump appointee in Delaware.

The video discusses the nomination of Steve Dettelbach as the new head of the ATF, contrasting him with previous nominees. While Dettelbach's background is primarily in prosecuting organized crime, hate crimes, and white-collar crimes, his past actions and social media presence suggest an anti-Second Amendment stance, particularly his involvement in efforts to reinstate an assault weapons ban.

This "Free For All Friday" episode features former US Attorney William Powell discussing crucial self-defense topics. The conversation will delve into self-defense law and the use of force, with Powell offering his perspective on the Rittenhouse trial. The broadcast includes live Q&A, allowing viewers to directly engage with the legal expert. Powell's extensive background as a lawyer for over 36 years, including his tenure as US Attorney, brings significant credibility to the discussion. His experience as a certified firearms instructor and competitive shooter further enhances the relevance of his insights.