If this is the ATF’s whole case… they’re screwed on this one...
This video analyzes the ATF's legal strategy regarding Forced Reset Triggers (FRTs), bump stocks, and ghost guns, arguing their case is weak due to a misinterpretation of the National Firearms Act (NFA). The speaker contends the ATF is focusing on rate of fire rather than the statutory definition of a machine gun, which requires a single pull of the trigger to fire multiple rounds. If the ATF loses on FRTs, the speaker believes their broader regulatory actions against other firearm components will also be jeopardized.











