Videos tagged with Washington State Supreme Court

This video from Washington Gun Law TV, hosted by President William Kirk, analyzes the constitutional viability of Washington's new income tax, also known as the "millionaire tax." Kirk argues that the tax violates Article 7, Section 1 of the Washington State Constitution, the property tax uniformity clause, citing the 1933 case Colatin v. Chase, which established that income is considered property. The video discusses the legislative rationale behind passing the bill despite constitutional concerns and anticipates legal challenges, highlighting the involvement of former Attorney General Rob McKenna.

This video analyzes the dissenting opinion in the Washington State Supreme Court case *State of Washington v. Gators Customs Guns*. It highlights Justice Cheryl Gordon Mcloud's argument against the 'common use for self-defense' standard, emphasizing that the Second Amendment protects arms for various lawful purposes, not just those approved by the government or measured by round count. The dissent serves as a blueprint for dismantling gun control arguments based on flawed interpretations of constitutional rights.

The Washington State Supreme Court upheld magazine bans in State of Washington v. Gators Guns, ruling that large capacity magazines (LCMs) are not 'arms' protected by the Second Amendment or Article 1, Section 24 of the state constitution. The court adopted a test that allows them to determine what is 'appropriate for self-defense' and whether items are 'commonly used for self-defense,' creating a dangerous precedent for civilian disarmament efforts nationwide. This ruling is being compared to arguments in Illinois' Barnett v. Raul.

This video provides an in-depth analysis of the Washington State Supreme Court's ruling in State of Washington v. Gator Guns, which upheld the state's ban on large-capacity magazines (LCMs). The speaker, a firearms instructor and legal analyst, breaks down the majority opinion, highlighting its reasoning that LCMs are not 'arms' under constitutional protection and are not necessary for self-defense. The video also extensively covers the dissenting opinion by Justice Cheryl Gordon Mloud, which argues that LCMs are indeed arms in common use for self-defense and that the ban infringes upon constitutional rights. The discussion touches on the implications for future legal challenges and the potential for a US Supreme Court review.

The Washington State Supreme Court upheld a law banning the sale and distribution of magazines holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition. The court ruled these 'large capacity magazines' are not protected by the Second Amendment or the Washington State Constitution, deeming them not 'arms' essential for self-defense. This decision sets a precedent that could impact future gun rights interpretations and regulations on firearm accessories.

This video provides an expert analysis from William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, on the Washington State Supreme Court's oral arguments in the State of Washington v. Gator's Guns case concerning large capacity magazine bans. Kirk critically examines the constitutional arguments presented under both the Washington State and U.S. Constitutions, highlighting perceived weaknesses in the State's position and potential misunderstandings by some justices regarding Second Amendment rights and ancillary protections. The analysis includes predictions for the case's outcome and emphasizes the importance of understanding firearms law.

This video discusses a lawsuit filed by Defend Washington against Secretary of State Steve Hobbs, challenging the validation of signatures for four Washington state initiatives. The lawsuit, defended by Attorney General Bob Ferguson's office, aimed to invalidate these initiatives. The Washington State Supreme Court ultimately dismissed the lawsuit, allowing the initiatives to remain on the ballot. The speaker criticizes the lack of notification to the 'Let's Go Washington' group, which spearheaded the initiatives, about the legal proceedings.

This video analyzes a highly critical Washington State Supreme Court opinion regarding large capacity magazines (LCMs). The speaker, William Kirk of Washington Gun Law TV, expresses strong disapproval of Commissioner Johnston's opinion, citing personal animosity and questionable legal reasoning. The analysis delves into the historical context of firearm magazines, the legal standards for granting a stay, and the commissioner's interpretation of Second Amendment and state constitutional protections.

This video provides an expert-level analysis of the Washington State Supreme Court's hearing on the magazine ban injunction in 'State of Washington v. Gator's Guns'. Legal expert William Kirk and Pete Serrano of the Silent Majority Foundation discuss the unique courtroom dynamics, the judge's conduct, and the legal arguments presented. The discussion highlights concerns about judicial bias, the application of constitutional law to modern rights, and the potential outcomes of the case.

This video provides an expert analysis of the shortest injunction in Washington State history concerning magazine bans. William Kirk from Washington Gun Law breaks down the Superior Court's ruling that Article 1, Section 24 of the Washington Constitution is absolute and protects magazines as 'arms.' The analysis highlights the court's rejection of the State's arguments for 'reasonable regulation' and the inapplicability of the Jorgenson case's intermediate scrutiny test following the Bruin decision.

This video provides an update on five key legal cases challenging 'assault weapon' bans across the United States. It highlights the ongoing legal battles, the current status of each case, and their potential impact on Second Amendment rights, emphasizing the slow pace of judicial review.