Another Way the DOJ Wants to Disarm You

This video from Gun Owners of America (GOA) critically examines the Biden administration's Department of Justice (DOJ) for its 'Zero Tolerance' policies. It highlights a perceived double standard where the DOJ settled immigration cases with the ACLU, barring policy reenactment for eight years and paying millions in fees, while refusing to settle with GOA on Second Amendment cases. The video details GOA's legal challenges against the DOJ's 'Zero Tolerance' policy targeting Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) for minor clerical errors, contrasting it with the immigration settlement.

The United States Department of Justice has begun restoring firearm rights to individuals with felony convictions, a process halted for over 30 years. This move, though administratively small, is significant given the legal landscape reshaped by the *NYSRPA v. Bruen* Supreme Court decision. It suggests a potential shift in how lifetime firearm prohibitions are viewed constitutionally, with ongoing legal challenges questioning their validity under the new standard.

This video provides an expert-level analysis of the ongoing legal challenges against the National Firearms Act (NFA). The speaker, demonstrating high authority in firearms law, details how recent lawsuits, spurred by the reduction of the NFA tax to zero, are challenging the ATF's registration and transfer schemes. Evidence of the ATF's discretionary denials of NFA applications is presented as a key factor in arguing the NFA is no longer a 'shall-issue' system under the Bruen precedent.

Harmeet Dhillon, Assistant US Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division, discusses the significant establishment of a dedicated Second Amendment section within the DOJ. She emphasizes the Second Amendment as a fundamental civil right, crucial for protecting citizens from state and local government overreach. The discussion covers ongoing litigation, the importance of legal parity with other civil rights, and the need for experienced legal professionals to join the division.

This analysis from Gun Owners of America (GOA) critically examines the Department of Justice's (DOJ) actions under Pam Bondi, alleging a pattern of fighting gun rights despite public pro-Second Amendment statements. GOA highlights specific legal challenges, including opposition to NFA lawsuits and attempts to moot Biden-era policies, while noting perceived double standards in legal settlements. The entry details unified skepticism from major gun rights groups regarding the DOJ's sincerity.

This YouTube video discusses a recent announcement from the Department of Justice (DOJ) concerning the Second Amendment. While the headline might suggest a pro-gun stance, the description indicates a more complex reality. The video aims to break down the DOJ's announcement, exploring how it might benefit some gun owners but potentially leave others unaffected.

This guide, presented by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, outlines tactical and legal considerations for drivers encountering mob situations. It emphasizes de-escalation, identifying escape routes, and understanding the legal thresholds for self-defense, particularly the distinction between property damage and threats to human life. Kirk, a legal instructor, stresses the importance of restraint and lawful action.

This video, presented by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, explores the complex legal question of whether one can legally shoot back at police if they are unlawfully firing. Kirk emphasizes that while a legal right to self-defense against imminent threats of death or serious bodily harm exists, the decision to use lethal force, especially against law enforcement, involves significant tactical and legal considerations beyond mere legality. The discussion highlights foundational self-defense principles and specific legal doctrines like the Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground.

This video, featuring William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, details how sheriffs in Arkansas are pushing back against federal gun control measures, particularly the ATF's pistol brace rule. It highlights Arkansas Act 1012 and state code 21-1-904, which aim to prevent state and local officials from enforcing federal firearms regulations deemed unconstitutional infringements on Second Amendment rights. The Arkansas Sheriff's Association has officially stated their non-support for enforcing such rules, prioritizing focus on violent offenders.

William Kirk from Washington Gun Law clarifies that the ATF cannot demand inspection of non-NFA firearms without a warrant. While NFA ownership doesn't waive Fourth Amendment rights, FFLs are subject to annual inspections, a rule not applicable to private individuals. If ATF agents arrive without a warrant, consent is typically required, and politely declining is advised.