9th Circuit Finally drops an opinion on Sensitive Places in Hawaii and California: what does it mean

Published on September 9, 2024
Duration: 21:41

This video discusses the Ninth Circuit's ruling on 'sensitive places' in the May v. Bonte and Wolford v. Lopez cases, following the Supreme Court's Bruin decision. Chuck Michelle of CRPA explains the mixed outcomes, highlighting wins like the invalidation of the 'vampire rule' and losses such as restrictions in bars, restaurants, parks, and zoos. The discussion emphasizes the ongoing legal battles to clarify the methodology for defining sensitive places and the path forward in the courts.

Quick Summary

The Ninth Circuit's ruling on 'sensitive places' in May v. Bonte and Wolford v. Lopez resulted in a mixed outcome for CCW holders. While the 'vampire rule' was struck down, allowing private property owners to ban firearms without specific signage, restrictions were upheld in locations like bars, restaurants, parks, and zoos.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Ninth Circuit Opinion on Sensitive Places
  2. 00:23Introduction: May v. Bonte & Wolford Cases
  3. 01:21Background of the May v. Bonte Case
  4. 02:11History of CCW and the Bruin Decision
  5. 04:39Senate Bill 2 (SB2) and CCW Restrictions
  6. 05:06CHALLENGE: May v. Bonte & Walford Cases
  7. 05:31Ninth Circuit Ruling: Mixed Bag
  8. 06:09Allowed CCW Locations
  9. 06:23Vampire Rule Struck Down
  10. 07:58Prohibited CCW Locations
  11. 08:35Confusing Aspects of the Ruling
  12. 09:41Sensitive Places & Historical Tradition
  13. 11:03Defining 'Non-Controversial' Laws
  14. 12:46Next Steps: Trial Court & Appeals
  15. 14:44Wins and Losses for Gun Owners
  16. 15:48Concerns: Parks and Zoos
  17. 17:51Timeline for Future Legal Action
  18. 18:17Methodology Clarification: Bruin Test
  19. 19:04Role of Other Cases (Bian, Duncan)
  20. 20:11Outlook for Recouping Rights

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the 'vampire rule' and how did the Ninth Circuit rule on it?

The 'vampire rule' required businesses to post a sign indicating guns were allowed. The Ninth Circuit struck down this rule, meaning private property owners can still prohibit firearms but are not mandated to post a 'guns allowed' sign. This allows businesses to ban firearms by simply not posting a sign or by informing individuals directly.

Which locations are now considered 'sensitive places' where CCW is prohibited by the Ninth Circuit ruling?

The Ninth Circuit ruled that CCW holders are prohibited from carrying firearms in bars and restaurants serving alcohol, playgrounds, parks (including state parks), casinos, stadiums, arenas, libraries, zoos, and museums, along with their associated parking areas.

What are the key wins for gun owners in the Ninth Circuit's sensitive places ruling?

Key wins include the invalidation of the 'vampire rule,' and the continued allowance of CCW in hospitals, churches, medical facilities, public transit, and permit-required gatherings, including their parking areas. This prevents the state from mandating 'guns allowed' signs and preserves carry rights in several important public spaces.

What is the next step in the legal challenge regarding sensitive places after the Ninth Circuit's ruling?

The next step involves returning to the trial court to challenge the Ninth Circuit's interpretation of historical analogues used to define 'sensitive places.' The legal team aims to present evidence showing these historical laws are not directly comparable to modern CCW regulations.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from CRPA TV

View all →