ATF Director Just Admitted This About FRT's During Senate Hearing

Published on June 5, 2026
Duration: 9:12

This video discusses a Senate hearing where ATF Director Robert Cicada was questioned about Forced Reset Triggers (FRTs) and their classification. The discussion centers on a settlement between Rare Breed and the DOJ, which created a carve-out for FRTs, and the legal definition of a machine gun under the Gun Control Act (GCA). The video highlights a perceived disconnect between lawmakers' personal agendas and existing firearm law, particularly the GCA's definition of a machine gun, which is based on a single function of the trigger, not rate of fire.

Quick Summary

The Gun Control Act (GCA) defines a machine gun by a single function of the trigger, not rate of fire. A settlement between Rare Breed and the DOJ created a carve-out for their Forced Reset Trigger (FRT), acknowledging it doesn't meet the GCA's machine gun definition, though some lawmakers advocate for changing the law based on firing rate.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction to FRT Debate
  2. 00:09Rare Breed Settlement and DOJ Admission
  3. 00:20Congressional Frustration with FRTs
  4. 00:39Questioning ATF Director Cicada
  5. 00:52Critique of Lawmaker Ignorance
  6. 01:04GCA Machine Gun Definition (26 USC 5845B)
  7. 01:21How FRTs Differ from Single Function Triggers
  8. 01:45Senate Exchange: Reed vs. Cicada
  9. 02:08Cicada on FRT Settlement Nuances
  10. 02:31Distinguishing FRTs from Other Devices
  11. 02:54Rob Leder's Objection to Settlement
  12. 03:15Cicada on Technical Nuances of FRTs
  13. 03:42Senator Reed's Rate of Fire Argument
  14. 03:55Critique of Lawmakers' Understanding
  15. 04:19Cicada Upholds Statute, Reed Demands Change
  16. 04:34Cicada's Stance on Settlement Bound
  17. 04:47ATF's Evaluation Process for Devices
  18. 05:01Insights into Director Cicada's Thoughts
  19. 05:13Lawmakers' Personal Beliefs vs. Facts

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the legal definition of a machine gun under the Gun Control Act (GCA)?

The GCA defines a machine gun as any weapon that shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot automatically more than one shot without manual reloading by a single function of the trigger. This definition is central to the debate surrounding devices like Forced Reset Triggers (FRTs).

What was the significance of the Rare Breed settlement with the DOJ regarding FRTs?

The settlement with the DOJ created a specific carve-out for Rare Breed's FRT, essentially acknowledging that this particular device does not meet the GCA's definition of a machine gun, despite its rapid firing capability.

Why are some lawmakers concerned about Forced Reset Triggers (FRTs)?

Some lawmakers, like Senator Jack Reed, are concerned about FRTs due to their high rate of fire, arguing that this should be the defining factor for classifying a weapon as automatic, even if it doesn't strictly adhere to the GCA's 'single function of the trigger' definition.

How does the ATF differentiate FRTs from other automatic conversion devices?

ATF Director Cicada explained that while FRTs are technically nuanced, there is a clear operational difference compared to devices like drop-in auto sears. The settlement specifically addresses the Rare Breed FRT, not all devices that increase firing rate.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Copper Jacket TV

View all →