Big Tech & Big Gov Teamed Up to Put You in a Database | MMM Ep. 34

Braden Langley of Langley Outdoors Academy analyzes recent polling data from Rasmussen Reports and Trafalgar Group, highlighting significant shifts in public opinion regarding gun control and the current administration. The data suggests a growing belief among voters that the government intends to confiscate firearms, with a particularly strong sentiment among gun owners. This alienation is reflected in President Biden's low approval ratings among this demographic, potentially impacting upcoming elections.

This video appears to be a critical commentary on a leaked USPS memo, suggesting that it indicates continued negative treatment of gun owners. The description heavily promotes a range of sponsor products and services, including bulk food supplies from Ready Pantry, coffee from Blackout Coffee, legal protection services from Attorneys On Retainer, and Guns & Gadgets branded merchandise. It also provides links to join various pro-Second Amendment organizations. The video producer's social media and other platforms are listed, alongside their video production equipment. The content is presented for informational and entertainment purposes, with disclaimers about safe practices and legal product availability.

This video from Line45 discusses a recent action by the DOJ targeting Washington State's "sanctuary law" concerning firearms. The DOJ has given the governor seven days to dismantle the law or face lawsuits, charges, and the loss of federal funding. The content creator emphasizes that this situation could serve as a blueprint for how the DOJ might target other Second Amendment sanctuary states across the country. The video aims to inform gun owners about the potential ripple effects of this legal challenge and its implications for gun rights nationwide.

This YouTube video discusses "Red Flag Laws" and "Gun Free Zones," framed as a "New Face of Gun Control." The description prominently features affiliate links for firearm-related companies like EOTech, Vortex, and Viktos, along with donation links for various gun rights organizations including SAF, Gun Owners of America, Firearm Policy Coalition, and CCRKBA. The presence of these sponsors and advocacy groups suggests a focus on the political and legal aspects of firearm ownership and regulation.

This video features constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith discussing how anti-gun groups are allegedly using legal tactics to hinder Second Amendment lawsuits. The focus is on the distinction between legislative and adjudicative facts in court proceedings and their implications for gun rights challenges. Smith, a noted Second Amendment scholar and frequent media guest, highlights the importance of understanding legal nuances for defending constitutional liberties.

This video discusses a recent filing by the Department of Justice (DOJ) that the creator perceives as a hostile action against gun owners. The description expresses surprise and concern, indicating the filing is unexpected given previous pro-2A rhetoric from the DOJ. The video aims to inform viewers about this development and its potential implications for firearm ownership.

This video highlights a critical moment in a Congressional hearing where Representative Thomas Massie corrected Representative Jerry Nadler's misquotation of the Second Amendment. Massie emphasized the full text, 'the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed,' underscoring the importance of including 'the people' and 'keep' for accurate interpretation. The segment serves as an educational piece on the precise wording of this fundamental right.

This video features U.S. Representative Lauren Boebert questioning the accountability of Hunter Biden for alleged gun crimes. Boebert highlights that lying on a federal firearms application is punishable by up to 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine, framing it as a "rules for thee, not for me" scenario.

This video from Gun Owners of America (GOA) details an ATF raid targeting a citizen for purchasing a solvent trap, which the ATF is now attempting to classify as an illegal suppressor. The citizen correctly asserts their rights, demanding a warrant. GOA is actively challenging the ATF's 'Frame and Receiver' rule, which has created legal ambiguity around solvent traps. The expert commentary highlights the ATF's inconsistent stance and advises citizens to always demand a warrant.

This video, titled 'We Told You So #ATF', likely discusses recent developments or pronouncements from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF). Given the 'We Told You So' phrasing and the association with Gun Owners of America (GOA), the content probably involves a critique or warning about ATF actions that align with GOA's stance on Second Amendment rights. The description provides links to support GOA, indicating a focus on advocacy and potentially legal or political aspects of firearm ownership and regulation. Expect commentary on ATF policies and their impact on gun owners.