Body Armor Is Not A Partisan Issue

Published on February 4, 2026
Duration: 1:32

This video argues that body armor is a non-partisan tool for personal protection, irrespective of political affiliation. It challenges the notion that criminals' use of body armor should lead to restrictions, emphasizing that personal safety decisions should not be dictated by criminal actions or political opinions. The speaker, affiliated with Predator Armor, highlights the logical inconsistency of opposing body armor while expressing concern over gun violence.

Quick Summary

Body armor is a non-partisan tool for protection, independent of political affiliation. It's logically inconsistent to oppose body armor while expressing concern over gun violence, as protection should follow from that concern. Restricting body armor due to criminal use is impractical; personal safety decisions should focus on available protective products.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Body Armor: A Non-Partisan Tool
  2. 00:13The Irony of Anti-Armor Stance
  3. 00:32Addressing Criminal Use Arguments
  4. 00:51Personal Responsibility in Safety

Frequently Asked Questions

Is body armor a partisan issue?

No, body armor is not a partisan issue. Bullets and firearms do not consider political affiliation. It serves as a tool for protection regardless of one's ideology or voter registration.

Why is it contradictory to be concerned about gun violence but against body armor?

It's logically inconsistent to view gun violence as an epidemic and simultaneously oppose body armor. If violence is a major concern, supporting protection from that violence should be a natural and logical extension of that concern.

Should body armor be restricted because criminals use it?

Banning bulletproof materials in specific standard shapes like 10x12 or 11x14 is not a practical solution to crime. Personal safety decisions should not be based on the actions of criminals.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Predator Armor

View all →