BREAKING: First Gun OFFICIALLY JUST GOT BANNED by Supreme Court

Published on October 6, 2024
Duration: 25:17

This video details the legal challenges surrounding Rare Breed Triggers' FT15 Forced Reset Trigger (FRT). The ATF classifies these triggers as machine guns, leading to litigation and a temporary restraining order against the company. The core of the dispute lies in the interpretation of federal law, specifically the National Firearms Act and Gun Control Act, regarding what constitutes a machine gun and the ATF's authority to reclassify firearm accessories.

Quick Summary

The legal battle over Rare Breed Triggers' FT15 Forced Reset Trigger centers on its classification as a machine gun by the ATF. While the ATF argues it allows multiple shots with a single trigger pull, Rare Breed contends the trigger resets, making it not a machine gun. This dispute involves interpretations of federal law like the National Firearms Act and the Administrative Procedures Act.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: Litigation Against DOJ and ATF
  2. 00:39Forced Reset Trigger Legal Battle and ATF Authority
  3. 01:09Lawrence DeMonaco: President of Rare Breed Triggers
  4. 01:41FT15 Triggers vs. Machine Gun Ban Debate
  5. 02:04Lawsuit Filed to Stop Rare Breed Triggers Sales
  6. 02:25Temporary Restraining Order Issued
  7. 02:42Definition of Machine Guns Under Federal Law
  8. 03:10ATF's Authority and Assertive Role
  9. 03:51Rare Breed Triggers' Defense and Revenue
  10. 04:38Expert Testimony on FT15 Triggers
  11. 05:08ATF Firearms Enforcement Officer Anthony Sirolo's Testimony
  12. 05:35Former ATF Employees Dispute Sirolo's Conclusion
  13. 05:56Daniel O'Kelly: Former ATF Special Agent's View
  14. 06:30Brian Luty: Former ATF Special Agent's Criticism
  15. 06:40Allegations of Fraud and Continued Sales
  16. 07:07Kevin Maxwell Denies Threatening Call
  17. 07:11Company Executives' Defense of Corporate Structure
  18. 07:35Fake Company Names on Shipping Labels
  19. 07:48DeMonaco's Actions Regarding Utah Warehouse
  20. 08:03Legal Battle Over Rapid Fire Accessories
  21. 08:20ATF Orders Company to Halt Sales
  22. 08:37ATF's History of Reinterpreting Federal Law
  23. 08:50Rare Breed Triggers' Response and Legal Action
  24. 09:01FT15 Triggers: Latest Rapid Fire Accessory Scrutiny
  25. 09:37US Attorney Brian Benczkowski on Rare Breed Triggers
  26. 09:59National Association for Gun Rights Lawsuit
  27. 10:11Bump Stock Ban and Forced Reset Legal Battles
  28. 10:44Controversy Over Forced Reset Triggers
  29. 10:56ATF Testing on FT15 Triggers
  30. 11:16Rare Breed Owners Argue FT15 is Not a Machine Gun
  31. 11:30ATF's History of Redefining Objects as Machine Guns
  32. 11:34New Legal Action Against the ATF
  33. 11:46Single Shot Function of the Trigger Argument
  34. 12:06DeMonaco's Belief in Legal Actions
  35. 12:10ATF's Stance on Constant Finger Pressure
  36. 12:18FT15 Triggers Designed for AR-15 Rifles
  37. 12:32Judge Nina Morrison's Temporary Restraining Order
  38. 12:43Rare Breed Forced to Stop Business
  39. 12:54ATF Seizes Inventory and Asks for Voluntary Turnovers
  40. 13:08Maxwell Questions ATF Approval of Other Triggers
  41. 13:20Binary Trigger Incident in Fargo
  42. 13:40Binary Trigger and Bump Stock Differences
  43. 13:52Federal Court Ruling on Bump Stocks
  44. 14:06Customization of AR-15 Style Rifles
  45. 14:23Robert Spitzer on Rapid Fire Gun Parts
  46. 14:33Spitzer on Reasons for Wanting Forced Reset Triggers
  47. 14:51Judge Morrison's Expected Decision
  48. 15:05Temporary Injunction Against Machine Gun Conversion Devices
  49. 15:16Prosecutors' Claims on AR-15 Style Rifles
  50. 15:34Preliminary Injunction Ruling
  51. 15:36FT15: First Company Barred from Selling Accessory
  52. 15:43Device Allows Semi-Auto Fire as Fast as Machine Gun
  53. 15:52Rare Breed's Stance: 'We Will Not Cave'
  54. 16:07Prosecutors' Allegations Against Rare Breed Triggers LLC
  55. 16:33Judge Nina Morrison's Opinion on ATF Classification Process
  56. 16:53Defendants' Deliberate Decision to Bypass ATF Process
  57. 17:14CNN Reaches Out to Attorneys
  58. 17:21Morrison: Prosecutors Likely to Prove Conspiracy
  59. 17:34Evidence of Fake Company Names and Destroyed Records
  60. 17:47Defendants Likely Attempted to Interfere with ATF Investigation
  61. 17:51DeMonaco Allegedly Tried to Take FT15s from Warehouse
  62. 18:01Threatening Phone Call to ATF Agent
  63. 18:16Government Has Not Proven Maxwell Involved in Call
  64. 18:23Maxwell Testified He Did Not Make the Call
  65. 18:30Caller's Message to ATF
  66. 18:36Morrison's Ruling Stops Rare Breed Triggers Sales
  67. 18:47Defendants Required to Preserve Documents
  68. 18:59DeMonaco and Maxwell's Belief in FT15 Legality
  69. 19:08Legal Challenge Regarding Forced Reset Triggers
  70. 19:14September 27, 2023: Expected Bigger Response
  71. 19:21Temporary Restraining Order in Place
  72. 19:28Individual Plaintiffs Must Surrender Triggers
  73. 19:35Drop-In Trigger Group vs. ATF Designated Machine Gun
  74. 19:45Firearm Owners Protection Act and Machine Guns
  75. 20:01ATF Attempted to Change Machine Gun Definition
  76. 20:07Technical Examination and ATF Letter
  77. 20:18People Scrambling to Get Rid of Triggers
  78. 20:25National Association of Gun Rights Lawsuit Against ATF
  79. 20:31Case Number 4:23-cv-00830-00
  80. 20:37Violation of the Administrative Procedures Act
  81. 20:49Standing and Plaintiffs' Clean Hands
  82. 20:56Early Challenge During Temporary Restraining Order Phase
  83. 21:00Summary: Potential APA Violations and Preventing Harm
  84. 21:11Significance in Firearm Regulations
  85. 21:13Limited Injunction vs. Permanent Injunction
  86. 21:25Judgment at Trial Court and Intermediate Appellate Court Levels
  87. 21:31First Bit of Good News in a Long Process
  88. 21:43Issuing Restraining Orders and Injunctions
  89. 21:53Judge O'Connor's Decision
  90. 21:59Judge O'Connor: Law is on the Side of Individual Plaintiffs
  91. 22:06ATF Has Overstepped
  92. 22:22Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms Cease and Assist Letter
  93. 22:26Teaming Up with Gun Rights Group
  94. 22:34Colleagues and ATF Boundaries
  95. 22:40Administrative Procedures Act's Role
  96. 22:46Courts Declare Agency Activity Illegal
  97. 22:54ATF Messed Up: Exceeded Statutory Authority
  98. 23:02Plaintiffs Claim ATF Regulation is Arbitrary and Capricious
  99. 23:13Complicated Nature of FRT Litigation
  100. 23:22Judge's Belief in Plaintiffs' Case
  101. 23:33Preventing ATF from Railroading
  102. 23:36Forced Reset Triggers Are Not Machine Guns
  103. 23:39President's Bastardization of Asylum
  104. 23:46Arguments Against Examining Bump Stock Regulation
  105. 23:54ATF Changing How They Treat FRTs
  106. 24:09Compelling Arguments in the Case
  107. 24:13Cargill v. Garland Case
  108. 24:16Mike Cargill and Oral Arguments
  109. 24:27Court Relied on Cargill Decision
  110. 24:34Fifth Circuit Disagreement
  111. 24:40Judges' Wheels Turning on Slaying Analysis
  112. 24:51Congress Criminalizing Bump Stocks or FRTs
  113. 25:07ATF Stepped In and Intervened
  114. 25:13Conclusion of the Video

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the core legal dispute surrounding Rare Breed Triggers' FT15 Forced Reset Trigger?

The central legal dispute is whether the FT15 Forced Reset Trigger (FRT) qualifies as a machine gun under federal law. The ATF classifies it as such, while Rare Breed Triggers argues it does not meet the legal definition because the trigger resets after each shot.

What actions has the ATF taken against Rare Breed Triggers?

The ATF has classified the FT15 FRT as an illegal machine gun, issued a cease and desist letter, and sought a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to halt sales. They have also seized inventory and requested voluntary turn-ins of the devices.

What is the significance of the Administrative Procedures Act in this case?

The Administrative Procedures Act (APA) is crucial as it allows courts to declare agency activity illegal if it exceeds statutory authority. Plaintiffs argue the ATF's expanded definition of a machine gun is an arbitrary and capricious expansion of its authority under the APA.

What is the current legal status of the FT15 Forced Reset Trigger?

Currently, a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction are in place, barring Rare Breed Triggers from selling the FT15 and similar devices. The case is ongoing, with a judge's decision expected on whether to make these injunctions permanent.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Best Iron

View all →