BREAKING: Judge rules FRT’s ILLEGAL and BLAMES company for misleading public into BUYING MG's...

Published on September 5, 2023
Duration: 7:31

A recent federal judge ruling in New York has declared Force Reset Triggers (FRTs), specifically those from Rare Breed Triggers LLC, as illegal machine gun conversion devices. This decision contradicts a prior ruling and creates a legal split, making a Supreme Court case highly probable. The judge cited the ability to fire 'as fast as machine guns' as the basis for the ruling, and also alleged the company misled the public into purchasing illegal products.

Quick Summary

A federal judge in New York has ruled Force Reset Triggers (FRTs) illegal machine gun conversion devices, citing their ability to fire 'as fast as machine guns.' This ruling contradicts prior decisions, creating a legal split that makes a Supreme Court case highly probable.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction and FRT Ruling Update
  2. 00:50Previous Ruling: FRT Ban Likely Unlawful
  3. 01:29What is a Force Reset Trigger?
  4. 02:00New Ruling: FRTs are Illegal Machine Gun Converters
  5. 02:37Key Verbiage: 'As Fast As Machine Guns'
  6. 03:41Judge Nina Morrison's Ruling Details
  7. 04:15Conflicting Court Opinions and SCOTUS Possibility
  8. 04:47Gun Control Push and SCOTUS
  9. 05:27Allegations of Fraud and Misleading the Public
  10. 05:54Assigning Intent vs. Regulatory Changes
  11. 06:21Reuters Reporting on the Ruling Contrast
  12. 06:46Legal Strategy and Gun Control Opponents
  13. 07:23Conclusion and Call for Engagement

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the latest ruling on Force Reset Triggers (FRTs)?

A federal judge in New York has ruled that Force Reset Triggers (FRTs), specifically from Rare Breed Triggers LLC, are illegal machine gun conversion devices. This decision contradicts a prior ruling and creates a legal split.

Why were FRTs deemed illegal machine gun conversion devices?

The judge's ruling focused on the ability of FRTs to allow a firearm to shoot 'as fast as machine guns.' This shifted the legal argument from statutory definition to the perceived threat of rapid firing capabilities.

Could this FRT ruling go to the Supreme Court?

Yes, conflicting rulings from different federal circuits create a legal split. This divergence is highly likely to lead to the Supreme Court taking up the issue of FRTs to provide a definitive national ruling.

Were there allegations of wrongdoing against Rare Breed Triggers?

Yes, the ruling included allegations that Rare Breed Triggers LLC fraudulently induced customers to purchase their FRT15 devices by falsely representing them as legal and withholding information from the ATF.

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Langley Outdoors Academy

View all →