BREAKING!!! Supreme Court 6-3 Decision Defied To Pass Broad Sweeping Mandatory Waiting Period!

This video from Guns & Gadgets analyzes New York's proposed ten-day waiting period for all firearm purchases, even after a successful background check. The speaker, an experienced firearms instructor, argues this bill (S362/A3233) is unconstitutional and infringes on Second Amendment rights, citing the Bruen decision. The analysis highlights that such waiting periods do not deter criminals and primarily impact law-abiding citizens seeking self-defense. The video urges viewers to contact their legislators to oppose this measure, as New York often sets precedents for other states.

This video from Guns & Gadgets discusses the NRA's lawsuit against New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham. The NRA argues the Governor's executive order violates the New Mexico state constitution's right to bear arms. The strategy involves seeking a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) and preliminary injunction in state court, providing a fallback if federal cases falter, similar to a successful strategy employed by GOA in Oregon.

This video discusses the legal challenges and outcomes surrounding New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham's temporary suspension of Second Amendment rights in Albuquerque and Bernalillo County. It details the lawsuits filed, the judge's decision to dismiss a preliminary injunction due to the governor modifying the order, and the ongoing debate about constitutional rights. The speaker emphasizes that these rights are not granted by any political party.

This video analyzes the controversial public health order issued by New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham, which aimed to suspend the right to carry firearms in Albuquerque and Bernalillo County. William Kirk of Washington Gun Law provides a critical legal perspective, detailing the challenges to the order, including a temporary restraining order and an NRA lawsuit. The analysis highlights the governor's persistence despite judicial pushback and public protests, framing it as a potential test case for broader gun control strategies.

This video details a lawsuit filed by the NRA and other plaintiffs against Florida's mandatory 3-day waiting period for firearm purchases. The lawsuit argues that this 'cooling-off' period, enacted after the Parkland tragedy, violates the Second Amendment by creating an unconstitutional barrier to acquiring firearms, even after a successful background check. The case hinges on the Supreme Court's Bruen decision and its emphasis on historical tradition.

This video analyzes the legal implications of New Mexico's now-blocked 7-day waiting period for firearm purchases. It argues that such laws hinder law-abiding citizens' ability to defend themselves, citing a tragic case and comparing the restrictions to other items used for harm. The content emphasizes the importance of individual self-reliance and the Second Amendment.

This video provides an expert analysis of the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari in Torcivia v. Suffolk County. The speaker, an authority on Second Amendment litigation, explains how the Second Circuit's ruling allows for warrantless firearm seizures under the 'special needs exception,' despite the Supreme Court's prior decision in Caniglia v. Strom. The denial means this precedent stands, potentially impacting future firearm rights cases.

This video provides an expert analysis of the Supreme Court's 5-4 emergency order concerning Texas's border dispute with the Biden administration. The speaker, an expert in legal matters, breaks down the implications for Texas's self-defense claims under the US Constitution and the ongoing legal battles involving border security measures like concertina wire. The analysis covers the 5th Circuit's role, the emergency application process, and the potential dismissal of the case.

This video provides an expert analysis of the Supreme Court's 8-1 decision denying a stay for Missouri's Second Amendment Preservation Act (SAPA). The speaker, an expert in legal analysis, details how SAPA attempts to shield state agents from enforcing federal gun laws, its comparison to Texas's SB8 abortion law enforcement mechanism, and the implications of the Supreme Court's ruling, particularly concerning the 11th Amendment and Section 1983 lawsuits.

This video discusses the Supreme Court's unanimous 9-0 decision in a case involving the Martins, who were victims of an FBI wrong-house raid. The core issue revolves around the discretionary function exception under the Federal Tort Claims Act, which the government uses to claim immunity. The Supreme Court's ruling clarified that simply exercising judgment does not automatically grant immunity, and the government must demonstrate that decisions were grounded in actual policy considerations, not mere mistakes. The 11th Circuit is now rehearing arguments in light of this precedent, with judges appearing skeptical of the government's broad claims of immunity for operational failures.